The Effects of Incredibly Small Inertia on Acceleration: A Scientific Inquiry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between mass (inertia) and acceleration as described by Newton's second law, F=ma. When mass is extremely small, even a small force can result in a disproportionately large acceleration. For example, applying 500 Newtons of force to an object with a mass of 0.000000000000005 kilograms yields an acceleration of 100,000,000,000,000,000 meters per second squared. However, at such high accelerations, relativistic effects must be considered, as Newton's laws become less applicable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly F=ma
  • Basic knowledge of mass and force units (kilograms and Newtons)
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Ability to perform basic calculations involving force, mass, and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of relativistic physics on acceleration and mass
  • Study the effects of varying forces on different mass scales
  • Learn about the limitations of classical mechanics in extreme conditions
  • Investigate practical applications of high acceleration scenarios in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of motion and the effects of mass on acceleration.

Sundown444
Messages
179
Reaction score
7
I have a question about inertia (as in mass and Newton's first law) being extremely small. Now, say the inertia of an object is, say, 0.00000000000000000000005 kilograms, or something like that. Would a light, weak force exerted on the object accelerate the object to high speeds, or would it work any differently from that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think this question is answerable as written. What do you mean by inertia in this context? And what units are you quoting your number in?
 
Ibix said:
I don't think this question is answerable as written. What do you mean by inertia in this context? And what units are you quoting your number in?

For the number, it is kilograms. For inertia, it is the tendency to resist change in motion, whether speeding up, slowing down or changing direction. Newton's first law, to be exact.

Sorry I forgot those details.
 
Ok - so you are using "inertia" to mean "mass". Fine. In that case, ##F=ma## is the only important thing (until we get to relativistic velocity, anyway). If ##m## is very small then ##F/m## will typically be large and so will ##a##.

Exactly what happens depends on how the force is being applied. It might reduce with velocity (like a ship being blown by the wind) or remain constant (like a rocket).
 
Ibix said:
Ok - so you are using "inertia" to mean "mass". Fine. In that case, ##F=ma## is the only important thing (until we get to relativistic velocity, anyway). If ##m## is very small then ##F/m## will typically be large and so will ##a##.

Exactly what happens depends on how the force is being applied. It might reduce with velocity (like a ship being blown by the wind) or remain constant (like a rocket).

So you're saying both the acceleration and the force will be very large?
 
Sundown444 said:
So you're saying both the acceleration and the force will be very large?
No. You didn't specify your force, but I had the impression that it wasn't meant to be tiny. I may have inferred incorrectly.

The acceleration will be ##F/m##. If ##F## is very small then the acceleration will be small. But for a given force, a smaller mass will accelerate faster.
 
Ibix said:
No. You didn't specify your force, but I had the impression that it wasn't meant to be tiny. I may have inferred incorrectly.

The acceleration will be ##F/m##. If ##F## is very small then the acceleration will be small. But for a given force, a smaller mass will accelerate faster.

Okay, so I used a calculator, and I put 500 Newtons over 0.000000000000005 Kilograms and the result I got was 100000000000000000 Meters per second squared. Would that be considered accurate, in that the force here is small and the acceleration is big if the mass or inertia is that small?
 
Sundown444 said:
Okay, so I used a calculator, and I put 500 Newtons over 0.000000000000005 Kilograms and the result I got was 100000000000000000 Meters per second squared. Would that be considered accurate, in that the force here is small and the acceleration is big if the mass or inertia is that small?
Yes.
 
russ_watters said:
Yes.

So small forces can produce large accelerations if there are infinitesimal masses (or inertia) in reality, then?
 
  • #10
Sundown444 said:
So small forces can produce large accelerations if there are infinitesimal masses (or inertia) in reality, then?
Yes; a=f/m. The equation works the same for an ant and an aircraft carrier.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Yes; a=f/m. The equation works the same for an ant and an aircraft carrier.

Okay, thanks!
 
  • #12
Sundown444 said:
Okay, so I used a calculator, and I put 500 Newtons over 0.000000000000005 Kilograms and the result I got was 100000000000000000 Meters per second squared. Would that be considered accurate, in that the force here is small and the acceleration is big if the mass or inertia is that small?
With these numbers you will be up to relativistic velocities in less than a nanosecond, and would need to think about relativity theory rather than Newton's laws. But, with that caveat, you are correct. There's nothing special about small masses.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K