About the derivation of Lorentz gauge condition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Lorenz gauge condition, specifically demonstrating that the condition ∂µAµ = 0 is equivalent to d∗A = 0, where A represents the four-potential, * denotes the Hodge star, and d signifies exterior differentiation. Participants clarify that the Hodge star of one-forms plays a crucial role in this derivation. A common error regarding the spelling of "Lorentz" is corrected to "Lorenz," emphasizing the importance of precise terminology in mathematical discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-dimensional space in physics
  • Familiarity with four-potential in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of Hodge star operator in differential geometry
  • Basic concepts of exterior differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Hodge star operator in differential forms
  • Explore the implications of the Lorenz gauge condition in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about exterior calculus and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between gauge conditions and physical theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying electromagnetism and differential geometry, particularly those interested in gauge theories and their mathematical foundations.

QuantumRose
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
The question:
Show that the Lorentz condition ∂µAµ =0 is expressed as d∗ A =0.
Where A is the four-potential and * is the Hodge star, d is the exterior differentiation.


In four-dimensional space, we know that the Hodge star of one-forms are the followings.
0c95a67c2cdabbfc965b8475ec01a96f4bce3af9


3. My attempt
Since the four potential one-form is
png.png

Therefore we have
png.png

Then d*A = 0 is equivalent of saying
png.png
(Where
png.png
)

However, the actual Lorentz gauge potential is
png.png
(Where
png.png
)

I don't know why there is a sign difference?
 

Attachments

  • png.png
    png.png
    841 bytes · Views: 584
  • png.png
    png.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 813
  • png.png
    png.png
    565 bytes · Views: 624
  • png.png
    png.png
    569 bytes · Views: 668
  • png.png
    png.png
    569 bytes · Views: 1,029
  • png.png
    png.png
    569 bytes · Views: 1,040
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumRose
George Jones said:
Aren't the indices "upstairs", here?
Opps, such a silly mistake... thank you!
 
The correct name is Lorenz, not Lorentz. Please, tell that to your instructor, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
966
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K