Absolute time, local time, planck time

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
sloughter
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
While Planck time is usually regarded as the shortest unit of time, isn't the shortest unit of time that can exist is the time it took to go from absolute time, the big bang, to everything after that i.e. local time? Did local time exist at the instant of the Big Bang?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean with "absolute time" and "local time"?
And how is that related to the shortest meaningful unit of time today?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
It's not, which means the whole rest of the question follows from a faulty premise.

In some sources like Wikipedia, Planck's time is regarded as the shortest unit of time.
 
mfb said:
What do you mean with "absolute time" and "local time"?
And how is that related to the shortest meaningful unit of time today?

If we assume that the Big Bang was absolute time was Planck's epoch the start of local time i.e. dependent upon the observer?
 
sloughter said:
In some sources like Wikipedia, Planck's time is regarded as the shortest unit of time.
It is the shortest time interval where our current physics could be valid. We don't know what happens at shorter time intervals.

If we assume that the Big Bang was absolute time was Planck's epoch the start of local time i.e. dependent upon the observer?
That question just does not make sense.