Theory of Interaction by Eugene Savov

  • Thread starter Thread starter John274
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the finite nature of real objects as presented in Eugene Savov's "Theory of Interaction." It questions the relevance of considering arbitrarily large or small quantities in mathematics, particularly in relation to calculus. The conversation acknowledges that while calculus is a powerful tool for engineering, it does not accurately represent physical reality, especially regarding concepts like infinity and infinitesimals. The participants argue that using these approximations simplifies calculations but may lead to multiple interpretations of physical phenomena. Ultimately, the need for new mathematical frameworks for discrete objects is highlighted as a potential area for exploration.
John274
The real objects are finite as shown in the book Theory of Interaction by Eugene Savov - http://www.eugenesavov.com

Then what is the sense to consider arbitrary large or small quantities?

Is there a need for new mathematics dealing with discrete (finite) objects?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you claiming that Calculus does not work? There's one heck of lot of engineering that has been developed using Calculus.

OF COURSE there is no such thing as actual, physical "infinity" or "infinitesmal": mathematicians have been saying that for centuries.

That's completely irrelevant to the fact that approximating very large things (or large numbers of things) by infinity and approximating very small things by "infinitesmal" simplifies the calculation enormously.
 
OF COURSE there is no such thing as actual, physical "infinity" or "infinitesmal": mathematicians have been saying that for centuries.
Calculus (mathematics) is a TOOL. It does not necessarily represent physical reality.
 
If we were to include the physics of the vanishingly small in all calculations, we might encounter an infinity of (or at least, many incompatible) interpretations, each uniquely describing a local physics.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top