A Absorption and emission spectrum in quantum optics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the emission and absorption spectra in quantum optics, referencing key textbooks that outline the formulas for resonance fluorescence and the relationship between electric field operators and atomic operators. There is a query regarding the formula for absorption spectra and how coupling to local vibrational modes, such as in polarons, might affect these formulas. The conversation highlights that both absorption coefficients and emissivities can be derived from Fourier transforms of the dipole moment auto-correlation function, linking to foundational principles in linear-response theory and the Green-Kubo formula. Additionally, a suggestion is made to explore spectroscopy texts for a more comprehensive understanding. The exchange emphasizes the importance of recognizing the broader context in quantum optics and spectroscopy.
Cedric Chia
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Absorption spectrum for a quantum dot
The emission spectrum or resonance fluorescence for a quantum dot, atom or defect center are discussed in many quantum optics textbook, for example see "Quantum Optics" by Marlan O. Scully and M. Suhail Zubairy Chapter 10 , "Quantum Optics" by D. F. Walls and Gerard J. Milburn Chapter 10 and "Quantum Optics" by Raymond Chiao and John Garrison Chapter 14.

In these textbooks, the formula for resonance fluorescence is given by:
$$
\alpha(\omega)=Re\int_0^{\infty}dt\left<E^{(-)}(t)E^{(+)}(t+\tau)\right>e^{i\omega\tau}
$$
where one usually relates the electric field operator with the atomic raising/lowering operator:
$$
\left<E^{(+)}(t)\right>\propto\left<\sigma\right>
$$

But what about the formula for absorption spectrum? Where can I find discussion on the absorption spectrum? And what if I have a system coupled to local vibrational modes (a polaron), how would that change the formula of emission and absorption spectrum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know very little about quantum dots, but I do remember a review paper on spectral line shapes: van Vleck J H and Huber D L 1977, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 939-959. Both, absorption coefficients and emissivities can be expressed in terms of Fourier transforms of the dipole moment auto-correlation function, or more generally, of the current density fluctuations.
 
  • Like
Likes yucheng and Cedric Chia
WernerQH said:
spectral line shapes: van Vleck J H and Huber D L 1977, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 939-959. Both, absorption coefficients and emissivities can be expressed in terms of Fourier transforms of the dipole moment auto-correlation function, or more generally, of the current density fluctuations.
Is this not found in spectroscopy texts/monographs (or at least rather quantum mechanical ones as opposed to semiclassical)?
 
That's a very general basic principle. In linear-response theory the response function is given in terms of the (retarded) autocorrelation function of the source. It's also known as the Green-Kubo formula.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...