Abstract Algebra and cyclic subgroups

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that the nth roots of unity form a cyclic subgroup of C^(x), the complex numbers under multiplication, of order n. The cyclic subgroup is defined as {z, z^2, ..., z^(n-1), z^n = 1}, demonstrating closure under multiplication, associativity, identity, and the existence of inverses. Participants clarify that a cyclic subgroup requires every element to be expressible as g^i for some generator g, emphasizing the importance of identifying this generator in the proof process. The conversation highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of subgroup properties as outlined in Michael Artin's "Algebra".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of cyclic groups in abstract algebra
  • Knowledge of subgroup criteria, including closure, identity, and inverses
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of cyclic groups in abstract algebra
  • Explore the concept of roots of unity and their applications in complex analysis
  • Learn how to construct and prove properties of subgroups in group theory
  • Review Michael Artin's "Algebra" for deeper insights into subgroup structures
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for the GRE, graduate-level mathematics learners, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of abstract algebra and cyclic subgroups.

brydustin
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


from Algebra by Michael Artin, chapter 2, question 5 under section 2(subgroups)

An nth root of unity is a complex number z such that z^n =1. Prove that the nth roots of unity form a cyclic subgroup of C^(x) (the complex numbers under multiplication) of order n.


Homework Equations



cyclic subgroup = {z,z^2, ... , z^(n-1), z^n = 1}

Closed under multiplication, is associative, has an identity and is cyclic (z^(n+b) = z^b becausse z^n = 1).

The Attempt at a Solution



What's the point of this problem? Have I "proven" it, I'm trying to prepare for GRE and I am reviewing algebra (I'm a graduate, this isn't actually homework), but I don't see how its not immediately obvious that its a cyclic subgroup (put another way: What is Artin trying to show his readers?)
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out the requirement that every element has an inverse. You also have the definition of cyclic wrong (it's that every element can be written as [tex]g^i[/tex] for some element [tex]g[/tex] that you haven't identified).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K