Subgroup of Finitely Generated Abelian Group

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
jumpr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that any subgroup of a finitely generated abelian group is finitely generated.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I've attempted a proof by induction on the number of generators. The case n=1 corresponds to a cyclic group, and any subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic, and so generated by one element. Then for the inductive step, I supposed that G was finitely generated, say [itex]G = \mathbb{Z} a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z} a_{n}[/itex], and that the result holds for groups generated by fewer than n elements. I've then let [itex]H \le G[/itex], and considered the quotient group [itex]G/\mathbb{Z}a_{n}[/itex], and then hoped that the correspondence theorem would help me out, but so far I can't seem to make it work.

Am I even attacking this problem correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
micromass said:
Try to prove the following general result, it might help:

Let H be an abelian group. If there exists a finitely generated subgroup K of H such that H/K is finitely generated, then H is finitely generated.

Does this work?

Let [itex]K \le H[/itex] be finitely generated where [itex]H/K[/itex] is finitely generated, say [itex]K = \mathbb{Z}a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}a_{n}[/itex] and [itex]H/K = \mathbb{Z}(b_{1} + K) + ... + \mathbb{Z}(b_{m} + K) = \mathbb{Z}b_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}b_{m} + K[/itex], where the [itex]b_{i} \in H[/itex]. Let [itex]h \in H[/itex], and consider [itex]h + K \in H/K[/itex]. Then [itex]h + K = y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m}[/itex] for some [itex]y_{i} \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex], so [itex]y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - h \in K[/itex]. But then [itex]y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - h = z_{1}a_{1} + ... + z_{n}a_{n}[/itex] for some [itex]z_{i} \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex], and so [itex]h = y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - z_{1}a_{1} - ... - z_{n}a_{n}[/itex]. Thus, [itex]H[/itex] is finitely generated.
 
Sorry, I'm going to have to ask for a hint as to where to go from there. My ideas for proofs tend to break down when I want to assume [itex]a_{i} \in H[/itex] for some [itex]a_{i}[/itex]when [itex]G = \mathbb{Z}a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}a_{n}[/itex].