Abstract Algebra Proof: gcd(s,t)=r and st=r+v

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof in abstract algebra involving integers r, s, t, and v, where it is given that gcd(s,t)=r and st=r+v. The participants are exploring the implications of these conditions to establish that gcd(v,t)=r.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss expressing s and t in terms of r and other integers, noting that e and d have no common factors. There are attempts to manipulate the equations to show relationships between v, s, and t, while questioning the validity of certain steps and assumptions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various approaches and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the divisibility of terms and the implications of common factors, but no consensus has been reached on a clear path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the application of theorems and the complexity of the proof compared to previous homework. There are mentions of constraints related to their current understanding of the division theorem and GCD theorem.

mcspammle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let r,s,t and v be integers with r>0. If st=r+v and gcd(s,t)=r, then gcd(v,t)=r

Homework Equations


Just stumped. I am not sure what to do next.

The Attempt at a Solution



There are 2 integers d and e such that S=dR and T=eR, and 2 integers a and b such that Sa+Tb=R. I know I have to end with something like V(integer)+T(integer)=R to show the gcd(v,t)=r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how about this as a start:
s=dr
t=er
worth noting that e and d here have no common factors
st = derr = r+v

so clearly v=a.r for some a
st = derr = r(1+a)

which becomes
der = (1+a)
 
lanedance said:
how about this as a start:
s=dr
t=er
worth noting that e and d here have no common factors
st = derr = r+v

so clearly v=a.r for some a
st = derr = r(1+a)

which becomes
der = (1+a)

I see how you did that but we usually can only do those "clearly" moments when we have a theorem or lemma to reference to, yet there is none for that. I still can't work from der=(1+a) anyway... I don't see how the "a" is going to help in anyway.

I feel like I need to just get V*(any variable)=(any variables) so that I can use V into my formulas.
 
Last edited:
can you explain what what step you don't understand? (and why - there could always be a mistake - never assume everything is correct unless you can justify it)

derr is divisible by r, so r+v is divisible by r (tempted not to say derr ;)

I'm guessing (haven't worked it) but from the following
der=(1+a)

You should be able to make a conclusion about common factors between a and d,e,r.

Maybe try assuming a and d have a common factor and see if you can generate a contradiction
 
I understand what you did. V is some random integer times A. I just didn't see how that could play out to my advantage later. This is only my second homework and we only learned the division theorem (AKA. f divides c so, f=cx) and the GCD theorem which I did below. I am sure you are heading down the right path but I am not advanced enough to do it. I don't want to do things we haven't learned. All his proofs were much simpler than this, I must be just missing something. Thank you though :/
 
If r+v=r(1+a) couldn't I do r+v=v(1+c) saying r=vc instead. With that r=v+vc-v. Sa+Tb=r... (dr)a+Tb=r... dv(c)a+Tb=r... So V(other int)+T(other int)=r so gcd(v,t)=r. Was that possible?
 
mcspammle said:
I understand what you did. V is some random integer times A. I just didn't see how that could play out to my advantage later. This is only my second homework and we only learned the division theorem (AKA. f divides c so, f=cx) and the GCD theorem which I did below. I am sure you are heading down the right path but I am not advanced enough to do it. I don't want to do things we haven't learned. All his proofs were much simpler than this, I must be just missing something. Thank you though :/

V isn't some random integer times A

v=r.a
v is r multiplied an unknown integer, a, which you can relate to the factors d.e.r.
 
mcspammle said:
If r+v=r(1+a) couldn't I do r+v=v(1+c) saying r=vc instead.
no the fact that "v" has "r" as a factor means |v|>r as they are both integers
 
lanedance said:
how about this as a start:
s=dr
t=er
worth noting that e and d here have no common factors
st = derr = r+v
the point i was trying to make here is:

d.e.r.r is divisible by d,e,r by definition

d.e.r.r = r+v, shows (r+v) must also be divisible by those terms

Clearly r is divisible by r.

For (r+v) to be divisible by r, then v must be divisible by r

Hence
v=a.r for some integer a

lanedance said:
so clearly v=a.r for some a
st = derr = r(1+a)

which becomes
der = (1+a)
 
  • #10
going back to your first post to see if i can clear any initial misconceptions

mcspammle said:

Homework Statement


Let r,s,t and v be integers with r>0. If st=r+v and gcd(s,t)=r, then gcd(v,t)=r




Homework Equations


Just stumped. I am not sure what to do next.


The Attempt at a Solution



There are 2 integers d and e such that S=dR and T=eR,
This is a good place to start, as you know S & T both have factor of r
mcspammle said:
and 2 integers a and b such that Sa+Tb=R.
not sure where you get this statement? in fact I would say it is in contradiction with you last


mcspammle said:
I know I have to end with something like V(integer)+T(integer)=R to show the gcd(v,t)=r.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K