A Proof involving the GCD and divisibility

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if two integers, a and b, are relatively prime (gcd(a, b) = 1) and both divide an integer n, then their product ab also divides n. The proof attempts to utilize Theorem 1.35, which states that there exist integers s and t such that 1 = sa + tb. The user struggles to demonstrate that the remainder r in the division algorithm, expressed as ab = nq + r, equals zero, despite exploring various proof strategies including induction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the concept of relatively prime integers
  • Familiarity with the properties of the greatest common divisor (GCD)
  • Knowledge of Theorem 1.35 regarding integer combinations
  • Basic principles of the division algorithm
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Theorem 1.35 in number theory
  • Explore alternative proofs involving the properties of GCD
  • Research the division algorithm and its applications in proofs
  • Learn about induction techniques in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying properties of integers and proofs involving divisibility.

AlexChandler
Messages
281
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If two integers a and b are relatively prime and if each divides an integer n, prove that their product ab divides n

Homework Equations



1=sa+tb for some integers s and t (thm 1.35)

gcd(a,b)=1

n=aa'=bb'

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried many many different ways to show that ab divides n, even tried a proof by induction. None of my methods seemed to be making any progress toward showing that ab divides n. Here is an example of something I tried:

Let gcd(a,b)=1 and let both a and b divide n.
Then by thm 1.35 sa+tb=1 for some integers s and t
Also we have n=aa'=bb' for some integers a' and b'
By the division algorithm, we have unique integers q,r such that ab=nq+r with r being a non-negative integer strictly less than n. Now I want to show that r=0 but haven't found a good way to do this. Clearly we must use the fact that 1=sa+tb and n=aa'=bb', but doing this does not give me that r=0 in any way that I have found.

If anybody has a hint or possibly a different strategy for this proof I would be very grateful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered using other characterizations of the GCD? Or even just using the properties of the GCD itself?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K