Abstract Algebra: Rings, Unit Elements, Fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of rings in abstract algebra, specifically examining the structure (R, *, ⊕) where the operations are defined as (x * y) = x + y + 2 and (x ⊕ y) = 2xy + 4x + 4y + 6. Participants confirm that (R, *, ⊕) satisfies the ring axioms, including associativity and distributivity. Additionally, the discussion emphasizes the importance of identifying unit elements and inverses within the defined operations, highlighting the need for clarity in notation to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and ring axioms.
  • Familiarity with operations in abstract algebra, specifically addition and multiplication in rings.
  • Knowledge of isomorphisms in the context of ring structures.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of unit elements in ring theory, focusing on specific examples.
  • Learn how to demonstrate isomorphisms between rings, particularly using matrix representations.
  • Explore different notations for ring operations to improve clarity in mathematical expressions.
  • Investigate the properties of abelian groups and their relationship to ring structures.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians working with ring theory, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to ring operations and isomorphisms.

S_Manifesto
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1) Show that (R,*,+) is a ring, where (x*y)=x+y+2 and (x+y)=2xy+4x+4y+6. Find the set of unit elements for the second operation.

I understand that the Ring Axioms is 1. (R,+) is an albein group. 2. Multiplication is associative and 3. Multiplication distributes. I just don't understand how to go about this. A First Course in Abstract Algebra by John Fraleigh fails to show any examples of this type.

2) Let f: Z[√d]→M be an application such that f)x+y√d=A where
[x y]
A = Matrix[yd x]

Show that f is an isomorphism of rings.

I understand that I have to check the conditions of it being isomorphic, but once again the book does not give examples of how to do so. It's hard to attempt problems when I don't know where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will help avoid confusion if you adopt different symbols for different operations instead of using + for the ring operation and for normal addition.
Let's start with showing * is associative, i.e. (a*b)*c = a*(b*c). Write that out using the definition of * you are given.
 
haruspex said:
It will help avoid confusion if you adopt different symbols for different operations instead of using + for the ring operation and for normal addition.
Let's start with showing * is associative, i.e. (a*b)*c = a*(b*c). Write that out using the definition of * you are given.

What I came up with was (x*y)=(y*x) → x+y+2 = y+x+2 to show it's albein.
x+(y+z)=(x+y)+z → x+(2yz+4y+4z+6)=(2xy+4x+4y+6)+z and got 4xyz+8xy+8xz+8yz+16x+16y+16z+30 = 4xyz+8xy+8xz+8yz+16x+16y+16z+30

For x+(y*z)=(x+y)*(x+z) → x+(y+z+2)=(2xy+4x+4y+6)*(2xz+4x+4z+6) and got 2xy+2xz+8x+4y+4z+14 = 2xy+2xz+8x+4y+4z+14
 
Looks fine (though I still wish you'd adopted a different symbol for one of the pluses).
 
haruspex said:
Looks fine (though I still wish you'd adopted a different symbol for one of the pluses).

The question has a plus with a circle around it, I don't know how to make that symbol.

But that's correct?
 
Yes, your solution looks fine.
If you click 'go advanced' then the capital sigma symbol from the options that appear you get a LaTex reference panel. In there, open Binary Operators. But for the purpose of the thread, you could have just chosen some character like %, provided you explained it.
 
S_Manifesto said:
The question has a plus with a circle around it, I don't know how to make that symbol.

But that's correct?

Here ...

 


S_Manifesto said:
Show that (R,*,\oplus) is a ring, where x*y=x+y+2 and x\oplusy=2xy+4x+4y+6. Find the set of unit elements of the second operation.

I've showed that it is a ring, showing it is Albein, Associative, and Distributive, but I do not know how to find the inverse to find the unit elements.

All I know is that I need to replace y with x'

You meant the first operation *, right? If you've shown it's an abelian group then you already know there are inverses under \oplus. You should probably find the identity under * in your ring first. What is it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
975
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K