Accelerate Charged Particle: Does Light Require Force?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
MackBlanch
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does a charged particle need to experience a momentum changing force to emit light? Or is it sufficient for an observer to accelerate relative to the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light emission by a particle is independent of the reference frame. It does not matter what the observer does, it matters if the particle is inertial or not.
 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with the term, "inertial particle".

So, it's not relative motion that drives emission, but changes in a charged particle's momentum?

For instance, if you shake one particle in a two particle system, the shaken particle will not experience an emission from the stationary particle? (at least not before its emission agitates the stationary particle)
 
It comes down to this - if the charged particle accelerates relative to it's electric field, then it will emit. If it does not accelerate relative to it's electric field, it will not emit. The acceleration of the observer relative to the particle and it's electric field does not cause the particle to appear to accelerate relative to its electric field.
 
Inertial = no acceleration
MackBlanch said:
So, it's not relative motion that drives emission, but changes in a charged particle's momentum?
Right.
MackBlanch said:
For instance, if you shake one particle in a two particle system, the shaken particle will not experience an emission from the stationary particle?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MackBlanch
mfb said:
Inertial = no acceleration
Right.
Right.

Thanks!