I Accelerate Charged Particle: Does Light Require Force?

MackBlanch
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does a charged particle need to experience a momentum changing force to emit light? Or is it sufficient for an observer to accelerate relative to the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light emission by a particle is independent of the reference frame. It does not matter what the observer does, it matters if the particle is inertial or not.
 
Sorry, I'm not familiar with the term, "inertial particle".

So, it's not relative motion that drives emission, but changes in a charged particle's momentum?

For instance, if you shake one particle in a two particle system, the shaken particle will not experience an emission from the stationary particle? (at least not before its emission agitates the stationary particle)
 
It comes down to this - if the charged particle accelerates relative to it's electric field, then it will emit. If it does not accelerate relative to it's electric field, it will not emit. The acceleration of the observer relative to the particle and it's electric field does not cause the particle to appear to accelerate relative to its electric field.
 
Inertial = no acceleration
MackBlanch said:
So, it's not relative motion that drives emission, but changes in a charged particle's momentum?
Right.
MackBlanch said:
For instance, if you shake one particle in a two particle system, the shaken particle will not experience an emission from the stationary particle?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes MackBlanch
mfb said:
Inertial = no acceleration
Right.
Right.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top