Calculating Gas Savings: Roundabout vs. 4-way Stop in Busy Intersection

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dondondon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Vehicles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating gas savings when transitioning from a 4-way stop to a roundabout at a busy intersection. Participants analyze the energy required to accelerate a 4,000 lb vehicle from 0 to 20 mph, concluding that approximately 10 ml of fuel is needed for this acceleration, based on a total energy requirement of 320 kJ. The conversation highlights the inefficiencies of roundabouts in heavy traffic and the potential for fuel waste at stop signs, particularly in winter months. The need for accurate modeling of friction and energy conversion efficiency is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of energy conversion and efficiency in internal combustion engines
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations
  • Concepts of friction and its impact on vehicle dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Newton's laws of motion in vehicle dynamics
  • Explore energy conversion efficiency in gasoline engines
  • Learn about kinetic energy calculations and their applications in automotive engineering
  • Investigate the design and efficiency of roundabouts versus stop signs in traffic management
USEFUL FOR

Traffic engineers, automotive engineers, urban planners, and anyone interested in optimizing fuel efficiency and traffic flow at intersections.

dondondon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
my community is debating the wisdom of putting a roundabout at a busy intersection.
we currently have a 4 way stop, and traffic backs up.
How much gas is used to accelerate your average 4000 lb vehicle from a dead stop ( as required by stop sign ) to 20 mph (apx speed to go through a roundabout)
I am trying to calculate how much gas would be saved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we need some differential equations here. Supposing that power of the car is constant, then driving force p/v then use Newton's law p/v-f=ma, assuming that friction is about constant. Then solve this equation to get velocity in terms of time.

Then get how much time is used to accelerate to 20 mph, work W=∫p dt=pt, since p is constant. I think here t can be expressed in terms of p and p would be canceled somewhere, then it depends only on friction f. You can experimentally determines how much friction is there. Work can then be used to calculate energy required and thus amount of gas via dividing by the efficiency of the car.

This is not an accurate model, since even ignoring air resistance, friction can be changing. But if there is no slipping, friction can be calculated in terms of angular velocity of the wheels thus the velocity of the car.

I am not very good at math. I don't know whether this is viable.
 
dondondon said:
I am trying to calculate how much gas would be saved

That would be less to do with the dynamics of large bodies and more to do with the design of your lights. If you have long periods where you can anticipate shutting your motor off, and long amber lights, or some other early warning, then you can plan your approach and it will cost you next to no additional gas. If you have short light sequences and no early warning, then everyone gets frustrated and wears out their brakes/fuel money.
 
you are missing the point.. I just want to know how much energy (in gallons of gas ) is used to accelerate a 4 k lb vehicle from 0-20 mph
 
dondondon said:
you are missing the point.. I just want to know how much energy (in gallons of gas ) is used to accelerate a 4 k lb vehicle from 0-20 mph

Have you considered my approach? Is it viable?
 
The energy used is equal to the work which is equal to the change in kinetic energy so the energy used to take a 4,000 lb object from rest to 20mph is 72,000 joules
 
dondondon said:
you are missing the point.. I just want to know how much energy (in gallons of gas ) is used to accelerate a 4 k lb vehicle from 0-20 mph


You have to put in 0.5x9m/s^2x2000= ~80kJ.

Fuel has 32MJ per litre.

You'll not get much better than 25% conversion total from an engine doing a standing acceleration (my guess for some red-neck's petrol-powered 'utility vehicle') so you'll need 320kJ worth of that litre.. which is therefore around 10ml of fuel.
 
A roundabout is an archaec traffic methodology...we have lots in NJ and they work ok with light traffic...adequate vehicle separation...but with heavy traffic flow they become very inefficient...so NJ tends to provide bypasses for heavy flow traffic to avoid such roundabouts. They are excellent generators of traffic accidents, however.
 
thanks to all of you for your comments here. You have given me plenty to work with.
Also I grew up in N.J and had to run the "airport" circle near Philli almost every day (before they did the flyover.) This one is on Martha's Vineyard. Lots of debate about it. We currently have a 4 way stop there that really backs up in the summer. In winter, I hate the idea that every vehicle has to waste fuel by stopping. It drives me insane to see people leave their cars running while going into stores..
I like the site ,, Thanks again..
Don
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
55K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K