- 6,002
- 2,629
Yes ok I made up my own problem because this thing puzzles me...
Accelerating wedge with a block at rest on it
- Thread starter rudransh verma
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
43 replies · 5K views
rudransh verma
Gold Member
- 1,067
- 96
I think the wedge can move with constant velocity but how can the block move with constant velocity if the net force on it is not zero.Delta2 said:
- 6,002
- 2,629
Hm, right but if there is friction between block and wedge this can hold true.rudransh verma said:
- 42,952
- 10,551
Yes, but without information on the coefficient there is no way to answer the question. That only leaves the option of assuming no friction and a non constant velocity.Delta2 said:
- 13,438
- 8,110
That says that the ground beneath the block is frictionless but says nothing about the wedge/block interface. Since that interface is not mentioned as "smooth" while the ground interface is, I read the problem to be including friction for the wedge/block interface.Mark44 said:
If it were a complete problem, context could make interpretation easier.
- 38,144
- 10,740
haruspex said:
In retrospect, I agree that the problem is silent on whether there is friction between the block and wedge.jbriggs444 said:
So, since the problem is poorly stated, it seems to me that the only recourse for the OP is to contact the instructor. The instructor could then either throw out the problem entirely or provide additional an assumption on whether there is friction between the block and wedge.jbriggs444 said:
If this is a problem that was made up by the instructor, it's not the first time in history that a poorly conceived problem was given.
- 19,385
- 15,622
Sure, but the OP could have solved the issue in advance, if he understood the dangers of being OK with poor problem statements, by including something along the lines of "the problem statement is incomplete in that it does not specify any coefficient of friction between the block and the wedge, so I am going to assume that it is zero and solve the problem under that assumption."Mark44 said:
- 38,144
- 10,740
Or maybe not. It takes a lot of experience and confidence to recognize that just because something is written down on paper, it's not necessarily the gospel truth, and could contain errors or lack necessary information. I don't think we should blame @rudransh verma here for not recognizing that the problem was incomplete.phinds said:
- 16,052
- 9,262
One can do better than that. One can examine all the possible cases and come up with answers.phinds said:
- The block is glued with gorilla glue on the wedge. In this case the coefficient of static friction is infinite and the block will not slide relative to the wedge for any P.
- The coefficient of static friction between the block and the wedge is finite. In this case there is a range of forces P with an upper limit. Furthermore, if the angle of the incline is greater than the angle of repose, then there is a lower limit to the pushing force in addition to the upper limit.
- There is no friction between the block and the wedge. In this case the pushing force is single-valued.
- 19,385
- 15,622
Actually, I agree, BUT ... when I pointed out to him that it was incomplete he argued that it didn't matter. I don't find that acceptable.Mark44 said:
- 16,052
- 9,262
I agree. I listed all the possibilities hoping that this summary will end the discussion before the mentors close the thread.phinds said:
- 19,385
- 15,622
Ha. These Rudransh Verma threads never seem to end, we just keep rehashing the same stuff over and over.kuruman said:
- 19,385
- 15,622
Hm ... I see he's lined out again. I wonder is this yet another 10 day or is it permanent this time?
- 16,052
- 9,262
Yup. I intended post #41 to be a gentle hint to the mentors.phinds said:Ha. These Rudransh Verma threads never seem to end, we just keep rehashing the same stuff over and over.