Acceleration: Blind in a Car & a Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter sr_philosophy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where a person is blind in a car with a pendulum, the pendulum's movement does not definitively indicate whether the car is accelerating, as it could also be stationary on a slope. The discussion highlights the indistinguishability between acceleration and gravity, emphasizing that no experiment can reveal whether the force felt is due to gravity or acceleration. The Unruh effect is introduced as a potential method to differentiate between the two, suggesting that an accelerating observer may detect black-body radiation not present in a gravitational field. This effect, while subtle, could provide insight into the nature of the forces acting on the observer. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between acceleration and gravity remains complex and nuanced.
sr_philosophy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
You are in a car and there is a pendulum suspended in front of you. You have no idea of what is going outside, i.e., you are completely blind from the surroundings. You can see only the pendulum and the interior of the car which has nothing else. You find that the pendulum is at the beginning straight down and later you find that it is bending towards you. (I hope you understand) Can you conclude that the car is accelerating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sr_philosophy said:
You are in a car and there is a pendulum suspended in front of you. You have no idea of what is going outside, i.e., you are completely blind from the surroundings. You can see only the pendulum and the interior of the car which has nothing else. You find that the pendulum is at the beginning straight down and later you find that it is bending towards you. (I hope you understand) Can you conclude that the car is accelerating?
No, the car could be traveling up an incline at constant velocity for example.
 
Last edited:
sr_philosophy said:
Can you conclude that the car is accelerating?

No, the car may be accelerating, but it is also possible it is stationary on a slope.

If you are in a windowless room, and the room tilts backwards, there is no possible scientific experiment you could do to discover weather it is gravity pushing you to the side of the room, or if you are simply accelerating.

There is symmetry between acceleration and gravity.
 
there is no possible scientific experiment you could do to discover weather it is gravity pushing you to the side of the room, or if you are simply accelerating

Actually there might be!...an effect discovered by Bill Unruh! Measurements of environmental temperature would reveal a gas of "hot" photons not present in a gravitational field. But this is very,very subtle.

The Unruh effect, which Unruh discovered in 1976, is the prediction that an accelerating observer will observe black-body radiation where an inertial observer would observe none. In other words, the accelerating observer will find himself or herself in a warm background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Unruh
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top