Acceleration calculation is mocking me

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating velocity and acceleration in the context of gravitational forces, specifically when an object falls from a significant distance. The original poster expresses a desire to understand how to calculate travel times for spacecraft using Newtonian physics, highlighting a particular challenge with changing acceleration due to gravity as distance varies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between gravitational force and acceleration, noting that acceleration changes with distance. There are attempts to derive equations related to gravitational acceleration and velocity, with some questioning how to incorporate time into these calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided mathematical expressions and insights into the nature of gravitational acceleration and its implications for velocity. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply these concepts to the original poster's scenario, with no clear consensus yet on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of recent practice with physics concepts, which may affect their understanding. Additionally, the discussion includes considerations of initial conditions for the calculations, particularly regarding the starting distance and velocity.

Asok_Green
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I took a physics class in high school, and considering how little I’ve since exercised the skills I learned in the class, I must say I’m pretty proud of myself for having come this far. But now I’ve hit a wall.

I enjoy reading and writing science fiction, but to write good science fiction you need a base of science fact, so I’ve been trying to learn how to calculate ballpark travel times between planets for spacecraft using Newtonian physics. I’m having an issue, however, with a concept I either never learned, of have since forgotten completely: Calculating velocity when acceleration is accelerating. Changing velocity of a rock dropped off a roof? No problem. Should be roughly 9.81m/s^2. Changing velocity of a rock that falls from being motionless at a distance of +12,000,000 km? Big problem. That’s a long ways, and some lone firing synapse reminded me that the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

So I know how to calculate the gravitational pull for given distance, but no idea how to find the acceleration of acceleration or use it to calculate the velocity of an object at a certain distance when it fell from a much greater distance. If anybody could explain how one goes about calculating things like these, it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are indeed correct that the acceleration changes as the distance decreases. The formula for this relation is:

[tex]a(r) = \frac {GM}{r^2}[/tex]

The problem with this is that there is no explicit time dependence. This just gives the instantaneous acceleration at some point r.
 
Asok_Green said:
I took a physics class in high school, and considering how little I’ve since exercised the skills I learned in the class, I must say I’m pretty proud of myself for having come this far. But now I’ve hit a wall.

I enjoy reading and writing science fiction, but to write good science fiction you need a base of science fact, so I’ve been trying to learn how to calculate ballpark travel times between planets for spacecraft using Newtonian physics. I’m having an issue, however, with a concept I either never learned, of have since forgotten completely: Calculating velocity when acceleration is accelerating. Changing velocity of a rock dropped off a roof? No problem. Should be roughly 9.81m/s^2.
I presume you mean that the acceleration is -9.81 m/s2. Then the velocity after t seconds is -9.81t m/s.

Changing velocity of a rock that falls from being motionless at a distance of +12,000,000 km? Big problem. That’s a long ways, and some lone firing synapse reminded me that the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

So I know how to calculate the gravitational pull for given distance, but no idea how to find the acceleration of acceleration or use it to calculate the velocity of an object at a certain distance when it fell from a much greater distance. If anybody could explain how one goes about calculating things like these, it would be much appreciated.
Gravitational force between two objects of masses m and M, at distance r (between their centers) is [itex]-\frac{GmM}{r^2}[/itex] so, since F= ma, the acceleration on the object of mass m, due to the object of mass M, is given by [itex]F= ma= -\frac{GmM}{r^2}[/itex] so that
[tex]a= \frac{dv}{dt}= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]
Since t does not appear explicitely in that we can use the "chain rule" to swap variables:
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{dr}{dt}\frac{dv}{dr}= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]
But dr/dt is the velocity so
[tex]v\frac{dv}{dt}= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]
which we can write as
[tex]v dv= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]
and integrate:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}v^2= \frac{GM}{r}+ C[/tex]
If you look at that closely, you'll see that it is really "conservation of energy":
[tex]\frac{1}{2}v^2- \frac{GM}{r}= C[/tex]
The first term is the kinetic energy and the second is the gravitational potential energy at distance r (each missing a factor of m).

Of course, then,
[tex]v= \sqrt{\frac{2GM}{r}+ 2C}[/tex]
 
Just a note on the constant that appears in the equations above. Be careful when determining the constant. For example Halls of Ivy stated the constant is given by:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}v^2- \frac{GM}{r}= C[/tex]

For your initial conditions (In the OP) the radius for this constant will be fixed at 12 million km and the velocity will be 0. Of course with this general equation you can have any initial conditions you fancy. Anyhoo just thought I'd point that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K