Acceleration - Displacement Graph

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the area under the acceleration-time graph corresponds to the change in kinetic energy per unit mass. The mathematical approach involves integrating the acceleration with respect to displacement, leading to the expression for work done. There is a query regarding the correctness of this proof and whether a different method exists. Participants highlight the confusion in transitioning from the acceleration-time graph to the acceleration-displacement graph, emphasizing the importance of clarity in problem statements. Overall, the conversation seeks to clarify the relationship between acceleration, work, and kinetic energy.
PhysicsStudnt
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
In terms of calculus, How do i prove that the area under the acceleration time graph gives me the change in KE / mass...

Attempt at solution...

Area under the graph of a function y = f(x) is given by ∫y dx

Therefore area under acceleration displacement graph is ∫a ds (considering the function to be a=f(s))

=> ∫f/m ds

=> 1/m (∫f.ds)

=> 1/m (W) ...[work done = ∫f.ds ]

=> ΔKE/m ...[W = ΔKE]


1. Is this proof correct mathematically and theoretically...
2. Is there a different or better proof...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you are trying to do. First, you talk about the area under the acceleration-time graph, then you talk about the area under the acceleration-displacement graph.

This is why PF has a HW template and we ask all HW posters to fill out the template when asking a question. It reduces the amount of confusion, which is always lurking to pounce on the unwary.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3977513&postcount=2

Be sure to include the complete text of the original problem as stated.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K