Acceleration in Space: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
In a vacuum, if a propulsion device with infinite fuel is used, the acceleration behavior is influenced by classical mechanics and special relativity. According to classical mechanics, an object subjected to a constant force will accelerate at a constant rate as long as mass and force remain unchanged. However, special relativity complicates this, as an object's mass increases with speed, making it require more force to continue accelerating. Consequently, while the object can approach the speed of light, it will never actually reach it due to the infinite mass that would require infinite energy for further acceleration. Thus, continuous acceleration leads to a gradual decrease in acceleration as speed increases, preventing the attainment of light speed.
mtyler216
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is the wrong section or a post like this has been already created. I had a thought but the question remains unanswered. I have limited knowledge of physics and was hoping someone on this forum could help me.

First assume you were in the vacuum of space. Next assume you had some sort of propulsion device ( engine, motor, jet, etc). Lastly assume you had infinite fuel.

If you began to accelerate would you,
A.) Accelerate to a peak speed pre-determined by the output of the device and continue at that speed. Also limited by numerous factors
B.) Accelerate at constant rate
or
C.) Accelerate exponentially.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be careful to about stating the exact conditions. For example, If you have infinite fuel, you don't move at all - your infinite fuel supply will have infinite mass - and I don't think that's the answer you're looking for.

If you are asking what happens to an object that starts out at rest relative to you and is subjected to a constant force by some external agency, classical mechanics says the object will accelerate away from you according to Newton's ##F=ma## for as long as the force is applied. If neither the mass nor the force change the acceleration will be constant.

If you allow for the effects of special relativity (which only start to show up after the object has already reached a significant fraction of the speed of light) the acceleration is more complicated. The object's speed gets closer and closer to the speed of light, never stops increasing, but never quite reaches ##c##.
 
If the infinite fuel supply is modeled as a kind of tanker truck that pulls alongside and transfers fuel as needed then the result is constant acceleration as measured in the instantaneously co-moving inertial frame.
 
Like Nugatory said, you'd never quite reach the speed of light. The reason is that as matter moves faster, its mass increases. When matter reaches the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite (which would require infinite force to accelerate further). If you keep applying the same force for acceleration, the ever-increasing mass means the acceleration gradually decreases (because the same force won't accelerate an increased mass as much) and you'll never quite reach the speed of light. To accelerate an infinite mass, you would need infinite energy, with neither being possible.
 
jbriggs444 said:
If the infinite fuel supply is modeled as a kind of tanker truck that pulls alongside and transfers fuel as needed then the result is constant acceleration as measured in the instantaneously co-moving inertial frame.

Indeed it is, and interestingly that will hold for both classical and relativistic mechanics.
 
Bob Carnevali said:
The reason is that as matter moves faster, its mass increases. When matter reaches the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite (which would require infinite force to accelerate further). If you keep applying the same force for acceleration, the ever-increasing mass means the acceleration gradually decreases (because the same force won't accelerate an increased mass as much) and you'll never quite reach the speed of light. To accelerate an infinite mass, you would need infinite energy, with neither being possible.

There's an FAQ over in the relativity section of the forum: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-relativistic-mass-and-why-is-it-not-used-much.783220/#post-4919337
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just in case your'e wondering about a more realistic situation with a limited supply of fuel: if ~63.2121% ((e-1) / e) or more of the initial mass of a rocket is fuel, then as the fuel is depleted, the rockets speed can increase greater than the speed of the exhaust fuel (relative to the rocket).
 
D) you would continually speed up, approaching c (the speed of light in vacuum) but never reach it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top