Acceleration of a mass lowered by a motor (Help with Non-Ideal Pulley)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a non-ideal pulley and the acceleration of a mass being lowered by a motor. The user initially calculated the acceleration as 0.602 m/s² but later discovered that the correct answer was -0.602 m/s² due to a sign convention issue. The confusion stemmed from differing conventions regarding the direction of acceleration, with the solution preferring downward as negative. Despite the minor error, the user felt reassured that their problem-solving approach was fundamentally sound. The conversation highlights the importance of adhering to established conventions in physics problems.
Kermit_the_Phrog
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
Summary: Non - ideal pulley question, should be easy but has got me good

Hey guys, looking for some help on this pulley question. It involves torque, and works with Newton's 2nd law in conjunction with a non-ideal pulley.

Text of question:
" When the motor in the figure below lowers the m = 1160kg mass, it produces a tension of 1.06E+4N in the cable on the right side of the pulley. The pulley has a moment of inertia of 75.7kgm^2 and a radius of 0.747m. The cable rides over the pulley without slipping. Determine the acceleration of the m = 1160kg mass. Use g=9.81m/s^2. "

Diagram:
1570661347930.png


Attempt

I found free body diagrams for both the mass and the pulley, and boiled them down to two equations, two unknowns as follows -

T2 = mg-ma

and

(r^2)T2 - (r^2)T1 = Ia

But when I added the equations together (subbed the first into the second), I got a final answer a = 0.602 m/s^2 , which was wrong.*Note - my final formula was:

a = (r^2)(mg - T1) / (I + (r^2)m)can anyone help me out?

[Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kermit_the_Phrog said:
But when I added the equations together (subbed the first into the second), I got a final answer a = 0.602 m/s^2 , which was wrong.

So as it Turns out, my answer was correct, BUT my sign was wrong: the correct answer was -0.602 m/s^2.

This makes me more confused honestly.

can anyone help me out explain this?
 
In your equations, you chose downward and ccw as the positive direction , which is fine , and that’s the way I would have done it. But apparently the solution likes downward to be in the negative direction, per typical convention. But since it was given that the mass is lowered, its picky in my mind to not consider your answer as correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Kermit_the_Phrog
PhanthomJay said:
In your equations, you chose downward and ccw as the positive direction , which is fine , and that’s the way I would have done it. But apparently the solution likes downward to be in the negative direction, per typical convention. But since it was given that the mass is lowered, its picky in my mind to not consider your answer as correct.

Thank you very much, it's good to know that I didn't make any sort of fatal error and that the body of my problem solving was okay. I guess the problem was just very picky on those minute details. Have a great rest of your day!
 
Thank you. You did a very good job in developing your equations. Ribbet, ribbet...
ribbet_ribbet.jpg
ribbet_ribbet.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Kermit_the_Phrog
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
14K