Acceleration of a suitcase in an accelerating train after getting pushed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the acceleration of a suitcase in a train that is itself accelerating. The context is set within a physics course, specifically addressing concepts related to non-inertial reference frames and the application of Newton's laws.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to calculate the horizontal acceleration of the suitcase in a non-inertial frame, questioning the applicability of Newton's laws in such scenarios. There is discussion about the role of friction and the forces acting on the suitcase, as well as the ambiguity regarding the appropriate reference frame for analysis.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants suggest analyzing the suitcase's motion from the ground frame, while others emphasize the need to consider the train's frame for a correct answer. There is recognition of the challenges in formulating clear questions in physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks clarity regarding the reference frame to be used, which affects the interpretation of the suitcase's motion. Additionally, the assumption of ideal conditions, such as frictionless wheels, is mentioned as a constraint in the analysis.

String theory guy
Messages
26
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Statement is below.
Relevant Equations
Newton's second law.
I was doing one of MIT's 8.01.1x course and came across this question.
1670973477837.png

In case 2, how would we be able to theoretically calculate the horizontal acceleration in this non-inertial frame? The course said that Newton's Law do not hold in accelerating frames.

However, could we find the acceleration if we knew the friction force from the train floor on the suit case then sum the forces in the x-direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction is ignored in this exercise. You may assume the case is on ideal, frictionless wheels.

In the earth frame (considered not accelerating) the only horizontal force acting on the suitcase is the 10 N from your pushing, so the case accelerates to the tune of 2 m/s2.

With respect to the train the acceleration is a sum. Suppose you push forward and the acceleration ##a## of the train is known (e.g. 1 m/s2, also forward), the acceleration of the suitcase wrt the train is ##2-a## m/s2.

:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

##\ ##
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy
The question is poorly worded. It is entirely unclear which frame of reference you are supposed to use.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and String theory guy
The fact that the suitcase is in the train does not imply that the analysis is (or has) to be done in the reference frame of the train. The suitcase is not in a specific frame depending on the train's motion. You can analyze the motion of the suitcase in the ground frame (and use Newton's law) no matter what the train does.

And here, as they say that there are no other forces acting on the suitcase, the suitcase will not even follow the motion of the train when it (the train) accelerates. It can be as well a suitcase on the platform and a train passing by. The train is irrelevant to the suitcase. At least until it hits the end of the car.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy
nasu said:
The fact that the suitcase is in the train does not imply that the analysis is (or has) to be done in the reference frame of the train
As I noted, it is unclear which reference frame the question assumes. To get the answer marked correct for case 2, it has to be the train's frame.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy
Indeed, the answer make sense with this assumption. But the question should make sense before you know the "right" answer. It is not easy to make good questions, I agree.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy and jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
26
Views
4K