Acceleration of the lower block

  • Thread starter Thread starter brunettegurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Block
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks, one on top of the other, with forces acting on them, including applied force and friction. The goal is to determine the acceleration of the lower block given specific parameters such as mass and coefficients of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on each block and attempt to set up equations based on Newton's second law. There are questions about the correct application of friction forces and the normal force acting on the lower block.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively working through their equations, with some providing clarifications and corrections to each other's setups. There is ongoing exploration of the equations and terms involved, with some participants suggesting revisions to improve clarity and accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential typos and misunderstandings in the equations, particularly regarding the friction terms and the masses involved. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to refine the approach without reaching a final conclusion.

brunettegurl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the diagram shown below, the lower block is acted on by a force, F, which has a magnitude of 58.6 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the surface is 0.204. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the upper block is also 0.204. What is the acceleration of the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 4.68 kg and the mass of the upper block is 2.11 kg?

Homework Equations



F=ma / friction = [tex]\mu[/tex]mg

The Attempt at a Solution



so i wrote the forces that affect each box

For the upper box ::[tex]\sum[/tex] F= T-[tex]\mu[/tex]m1g
for the lower box :: [tex]\sum[/tex] F= F-T- friction1- friction2

i solved the first equation for tension and then substituted it into the 2nd equation and i solved for acceleration...can u pls. tell me what I'm doing wrong thanks :))
 

Attachments

  • kn-pic0828.png
    kn-pic0828.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 831
Physics news on Phys.org
brunettegurl said:
so i wrote the forces that affect each box

For the upper box ::[tex]\sum[/tex] F= T-[tex]\mu[/tex]m1g
for the lower box :: [tex]\sum[/tex] F= F-T- friction1- friction2
OK, but what did you use for the friction forces on the lower box?
i solved the first equation for tension and then substituted it into the 2nd equation and i solved for acceleration...can u pls. tell me what I'm doing wrong thanks :))
I assume you applied Newton's 2nd law to each box to get two equations. Show exactly what you did and then we can see what went wrong.
 
for friction 1 i used (coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity) and for friction 2 i use (coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)
and the equation i got before isolating for acceleration is ::

a(m2+m1)= Fapplied-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)

so then a = [Fapplied-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)] /(m1+m2)
 
brunettegurl said:
for friction 1 i used (coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)
OK.
and for friction 2 i use (coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)
Careful: What's the normal force between the bottom block and the floor?
 
is it f 2 = coeffecient of frictionxmass2+ mass1xgravity...?
 
brunettegurl said:
is it f 2 = coeffecient of frictionxmass2+ mass1xgravity...?
Yes, the normal force is the combined weight of both blocks, thus f2 = μ(m1 + m2)g.
 
ok so i changed that and my answer is still coming out wrong is there anything else wrong i cld have done in the initial equation??
 
brunettegurl said:
ok so i changed that and my answer is still coming out wrong is there anything else wrong i cld have done in the initial equation??
Show me your final equation.
 
my final equation wld look like ::
m2a = [Fapplied-m1a-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1=mass2xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)]


a = [Fapplied-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1=mass2xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)] /(m1+m2)

Fapplied is the force given in the question
 
  • #10
brunettegurl said:
my final equation wld look like ::
m2a = [Fapplied-m1a-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1=mass2xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)]


a = [Fapplied-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass1=mass2xgravity)-(coeffecient of frictionxmass2xgravity)] /(m1+m2)

Fapplied is the force given in the question
Your equations are a bit confusing, due to what may be a few typos. (The '=', for one.) Can you rewrite using F, m1, m2, μ, and g? Try to simplify as much as possible.
 
  • #11
m2a= [F -m1a- (μm1g)- (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm2g)]

a = [F - (μm1g) - (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm2g)]/(m1+m2)

iss that clearer ??
 
  • #12
brunettegurl said:
m2a= [F -m1a- (μm1g)- (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm2g)]

a = [F - (μm1g) - (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm2g)]/(m1+m2)

iss that clearer ??
Yes, much clearer. You have an extra m2 term in there for some reason. If you write the original Newton's law equations for m1 and m2, perhaps we can see where it got snuck in.
 
  • #13
this is what i have as my equations for m1 and m2

m1:: m1a= T- μm1g
m2 :: m2a = Fapp - T- μ(m1+m2)g- μm2g

i don't see the extra m2 in my equations can u be a bit more specific
 
  • #14
brunettegurl said:
this is what i have as my equations for m1 and m2

m1:: m1a= T- μm1g
m2 :: m2a = Fapp - T- μ(m1+m2)g- μm2g
That second friction term in the m2 equation is the problem--you're using the wrong mass.
 
  • #15
so this m2 :: m2a = Fapp - T- μ(m1+m2)g- μm2g wld be this m2 :: m2a = Fapp - T- μ(m1+m2)g- μm1g...
then the final equation wld look like a = [Fapp - (μm1g) - (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm1g)]/(m1+m2)
is that correct??
 
  • #16
brunettegurl said:
then the final equation wld look like a = [Fapp - (μm1g) - (μg(m1+m2)) - (μm1g)]/(m1+m2)
is that correct??
That looks good. But consolidate some of those terms.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K