Accelerations of Boxes on a Horizontal Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter sci-doo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating
sci-doo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Box 1 is placed on box 2, which sits on the floor. Kinetic friction constant between the boxes, and the box 2 and the floor, is equal u.

When box 1 is pushed with horizontal force F it starts to slide on box 2. At the same time, box 2 starts to move. What are the accelerations of the boxes.

Homework Equations


Kinetic friction Fk=ukN
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


The top box (box 1):
Force that accelerates (pushing minus friction)
Fa=F-Fu=F-ukN
and the acceleration
a=[tex]\frac{F-u_{k}N}{m_{box1}}[/tex]

The lower box (box 2):

By the Newtons 3rd law the force that pushes the box 2 is the reaction of kinetic friction Fu between the boxes, right? Now this is where I face the problem: as the friction between box 2 and floor is the same but the weight is more (box1+box2) I get negative acceleration ?!? :cry:
 
on Phys.org
Consider the limiting cases: The second box on a frictionless surface, and the second box fastened to the surface such that this box cannot move.
 
Welcome to PF.

Your kinetic friction arises because it is moving relative to the box underneath.

Now Kinetic friction is a retarding force given by the μ *m*g relationship.

The maximum force then that Box 1 can transfer to box 2 is just that.

As you note though box 2 has a retarding force available of μ *(m + m) * g.

Since μ *(2m)*g will always be > μ *m*g then I have serious doubt that the bottom box moves despite the statement of the problem. So I'd say it's not negative acceleration, just 0 movement.
 
LowlyPion said:
Since μ *(2m)*g will always be > μ *m*g then I have serious doubt that the bottom box moves despite the statement of the problem. So I'd say it's not negative acceleration, just 0 movement.

Makes sense.

I don't see how it could move (especially to opposite direction)... I think it'd move (to positive drctn) only if the weight was <0 ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K