Achieving Record Distances in the Hammer Throw

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr1709
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a hammer throw ball at release and determining its range. The athlete must achieve a centripetal acceleration of 711 m/s² to reach a record distance of 87 meters. The calculated release speed is 29.33 m/s, while the final velocity in the y-component at a height of 2 meters is 19.6 m/s. The solution manual's use of positive 9.8 m/s² for acceleration is debated, with a consensus that -9.8 m/s² should be applied for downward motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration and its calculation
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations for projectile motion
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic principles of free fall and gravitational acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Learn about projectile motion and the use of kinematic equations
  • Explore the concept of vector decomposition in physics
  • Review the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Athletes, coaches, physics students, and educators interested in the mechanics of projectile motion and performance optimization in sports like hammer throw.

mr1709
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The record distance for the hammer throw is about 87m. to achieve this distance, an athlete must produce a centripetal acceleration of nearly 711 m/s^2.
a) Given a radius of 1.21 m calculate the speed of the ball when it is released
b) The athlete let's go when the ball is 2.0 m above the ground moving at an angle of 42 degrees above the horizontal. Determine the range. Ignore any air friction

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
Solved part a and got a velocity of 29.33 m/s. Having an issue with b, i have the solution manuals solution but i don't quite understand why they did certain things in their process. For one, why did they find the final velocity in the y component, why not just immediately find the time? And, they used displacement as -2...which makes sense because its a displacement of -2 metres, but they used positive 9.8 as the acceleration. Why was -9.8 not used and why did they even find the final velocity...why not just go straight to the time using a different kinematic equation? The attached pics contain my solution and the textbooks solution.
 

Attachments

  • 48079425_2535110689838669_8054112575438192640_n.jpg
    48079425_2535110689838669_8054112575438192640_n.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 883
  • sasa.png
    sasa.png
    30.6 KB · Views: 920
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The two solutions are equivalent and ought to give the same answer. Which one is used depends on one's personal preference. Having said that, I add that you are correct in pointing out that they should have used -9.8 m/s2. The y-component of the velocity is 19.6 m/s at a height of 2 m above ground. When in drops on the ground it must have a magnitude larger than 19.6 m/s. The solution's claim that it's 18.58 m/s is in error.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mr1709

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K