Adding a variable to a Lagrangian

  • Thread starter Thread starter MyoPhilosopher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Variable
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of adding a constant velocity term to a Lagrangian, specifically examining the expression $$ L = m(\vec{\dot r + \vec v})$$ and its effects on the Euler-Lagrange equations. Participants explore concepts related to energy conservation and the dimensionality of the Lagrangian in the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether the addition of a constant velocity affects the equations of motion and discuss the dimensionality of the Lagrangian, emphasizing that it should represent energy rather than momentum. There are inquiries about the nature of the transformation involved when adding a constant velocity and its implications for the equations of motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights regarding the invariance of the equations of motion under the transformation associated with adding a constant velocity. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of this transformation, with multiple interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of the need for clarity regarding the dimensions of the Lagrangian and its representation in terms of kinetic and potential energy. Some participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of certain formulations and transformations.

MyoPhilosopher
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
$$ L = m\vec{\dot r}$$
Relevant Equations
-
Would the following: $$ L = m(\vec{\dot r + \vec v})$$ (constant velocity added to above eq.)
lead to equivalent euler-lagrange equations due to the fact that the ratio of T and V is unaffected by an increase in constant velocity?
And would this be an example of energy conservation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MyoPhilosopher said:
$$ L = m\vec{\dot r}$$
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
 
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.
Even more importantly, it should be a scalar and not a vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
actually the Lagrange equations do not care even if you add
$$\frac{d}{dt}f(t,\boldsymbol r)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t }+\Big(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol r},\boldsymbol{\dot r}\Big)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MyoPhilosopher
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
wrobel said:
actually the Lagrange equations do not care even if you add
$$\frac{d}{dt}f(t,\boldsymbol r)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t }+\Big(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol r},\boldsymbol{\dot r}\Big)$$
What exactly does adding constant velocity do? Would is simply increase the r_dot vectors equally and therefore not affect the equations of motion?
 
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
I should have squared my second term, would this be appropriate $$ L = {m(\vec{\dot r + \vec v})}^2$$
 
MyoPhilosopher said:
What exactly does adding constant velocity do? Would is simply increase the r_dot vectors equally and therefore not affect the equations of motion?
Adding a constant velocity is effectively doing a Galilean boost, i.e., transforming to a coordinate system that moves at constant velocity relative to your original coordinate system.

The difference between the Lagrangians is ##m (\vec v \cdot \dot{\vec r} + v^2/2) = \frac d{dt}(\vec v \cdot \vec r + v^2 t/2)##. Thus, as per #4, the equations of motion are invariant under this transformation (which actually is the transformation ##\vec r \to \vec r + \vec v t##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MyoPhilosopher and etotheipi
Orodruin said:
Adding a constant velocity is effectively doing a Galilean boost, i.e., transforming to a coordinate system that moves at constant velocity relative to your original coordinate system.

The difference between the Lagrangians is ##m (\vec v \cdot \dot{\vec r} + v^2/2) = \frac d{dt}(\vec v \cdot \vec r + v^2 t/2)##. Thus, as per #4, the equations of motion are invariant under this transformation (which actually is the transformation ##\vec r \to \vec r + \vec v t##).

Ahhh thank you that clarified it elegantly!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
924
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K