Adding "annihilating terms" to factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter DS2C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of the expression \(a^4 - b^4\) and the concept of "annihilating terms" as introduced in a textbook. Participants explore various methods of factoring polynomials and question the validity of multiple factorization forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of adding terms to facilitate factorization and question the rationale behind inserting "annihilating terms." Some express confusion about the implications of having multiple correct factorizations and whether there is a systematic approach to determining these terms.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and clarifications about the nature of factorization. Some have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are still seeking to understand the concept of "annihilating terms" and its application in polynomial factorization.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of varying levels of understanding among participants, with some only familiar with basic polynomial forms. The discussion also references previous threads that touch on similar topics, indicating a broader context of inquiry into factorization methods.

DS2C
Not a homework problem, just something I came across in my book that makes sense but not fully.

Homework Statement


Factor: ##a^4-b^4##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The book's solution:

##a^4-b^4##
##=a^4-a^3b+a^3b-a^2b^2+a^2b^2-ab^3+ab^3-b^4##
##=a^3\left(a-b\right)+a^2b\left(a-b\right)+ab^2\left(a-b\right)+b^3\left(a-b\right)##
##=\left(a-b\right)\left(a^3+a^2b+ab^2+b^3\right)##

Just what is going on here? Such a tiny binomial resulting in something way larger, with what seem like arbitrary terms added in.

Additionally, it gives another factorization of the given problem ##a^4-b^4## which is also factored into ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)\left(a^2+b^2\right)##
You can have more than one correct solution when factoring a polynomial? In what situations would one be the "correct vs incorrect" way? Or is it synonymous with something like factoring 12 into 4*3, 6*2, 12*1 where they are all correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could still perform another factorization on ##a^2-b^2##. Since it didn't say until only irreducible factors are left, it has indeed more than one solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and DS2C
Man this factoring stuff goes deep. Feels like there should be an entire semester focusing on just this. Must be pretty important!
 
DS2C said:
Man this factoring stuff goes deep. Feels like there should be an entire semester focusing on just this. Must be pretty important!
It is, and of course it's always only up to units, as one can always factor ##f(x) = c \cdot (c^{-1} \cdot f(x))## and which is of no use.
 
Not at all sure what that means unfortunately. I'm only at factoring polynomials in the form of ##ax^2+bx+c## currently. There's obviously a lot more to learn.
 
Well, just apply what you did once again on: ##a^4-b^4=(a^2-b^2)(a^2+b^2)## and you get three factors, which cannot be split any further, so we call them irreducible. The terms ##a^4-b^4## and ##a^2-b^2## are reducible.
 
Yeah that's my thread too lol. The reason for a new thread is a new aspect of the factoring. The problem posted, which was out of my book, mentions "inserting annihilating terms" into the expression to factor. This is what I am having trouble wrapping my head around. Why do this and how do you determine what "annihilating" terms to input?
 
DS2C said:
Yeah that's my thread too lol. The reason for a new thread is a new aspect of the factoring. The problem posted, which was out of my book, mentions "inserting annihilating terms" into the expression to factor. This is what I am having trouble wrapping my head around. Why do this and how do you determine what "annihilating" terms to input?
It is simply another way to describe a division. Instead of calculating ##(a^4-b^4):(a-b)## the entire division is somehow written backwards. If we know the result, then we know which "annihilating terms" to be added. Otherwise it's probably a try and error. I still prefer the division. I doubt there is a system behind it.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
That makes more sense. Here's the text in question for reference.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3805.JPG
    IMG_3805.JPG
    47.6 KB · Views: 527
  • IMG_3806.JPG
    IMG_3806.JPG
    39.5 KB · Views: 500
  • #11
Factor again ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)\left(a^2+b^2\right)##

To see that the two factorisations are actually the same, try to re-write the above factorisation as ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a^3+a^2b+ab^2+b^3\right)##. You should see what to do after the first step above.

Normally in factorising we try to factorise each factor as far as possible, so in this case, the first part of this reply is what we normally do.
 
  • #12
qspeechc said:
Factor again ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)\left(a^2+b^2\right)##
I assume you've meant ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a+b\right)##.
 
  • #13
fresh_42 said:
I assume you've meant ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a+b\right)##.

No. "In" not "into", as in, factor again the part ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in the expression ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a+b\right)##
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K