Adding "annihilating terms" to factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter DS2C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 2K views
DS2C
Not a homework problem, just something I came across in my book that makes sense but not fully.

Homework Statement


Factor: ##a^4-b^4##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The book's solution:

##a^4-b^4##
##=a^4-a^3b+a^3b-a^2b^2+a^2b^2-ab^3+ab^3-b^4##
##=a^3\left(a-b\right)+a^2b\left(a-b\right)+ab^2\left(a-b\right)+b^3\left(a-b\right)##
##=\left(a-b\right)\left(a^3+a^2b+ab^2+b^3\right)##

Just what is going on here? Such a tiny binomial resulting in something way larger, with what seem like arbitrary terms added in.

Additionally, it gives another factorization of the given problem ##a^4-b^4## which is also factored into ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)\left(a^2+b^2\right)##
You can have more than one correct solution when factoring a polynomial? In what situations would one be the "correct vs incorrect" way? Or is it synonymous with something like factoring 12 into 4*3, 6*2, 12*1 where they are all correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Man this factoring stuff goes deep. Feels like there should be an entire semester focusing on just this. Must be pretty important!
 
Not at all sure what that means unfortunately. I'm only at factoring polynomials in the form of ##ax^2+bx+c## currently. There's obviously a lot more to learn.
 
Yeah that's my thread too lol. The reason for a new thread is a new aspect of the factoring. The problem posted, which was out of my book, mentions "inserting annihilating terms" into the expression to factor. This is what I am having trouble wrapping my head around. Why do this and how do you determine what "annihilating" terms to input?
 
DS2C said:
Yeah that's my thread too lol. The reason for a new thread is a new aspect of the factoring. The problem posted, which was out of my book, mentions "inserting annihilating terms" into the expression to factor. This is what I am having trouble wrapping my head around. Why do this and how do you determine what "annihilating" terms to input?
It is simply another way to describe a division. Instead of calculating ##(a^4-b^4):(a-b)## the entire division is somehow written backwards. If we know the result, then we know which "annihilating terms" to be added. Otherwise it's probably a try and error. I still prefer the division. I doubt there is a system behind it.
 
Last edited:
That makes more sense. Here's the text in question for reference.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3805.JPG
    IMG_3805.JPG
    47.6 KB · Views: 539
  • IMG_3806.JPG
    IMG_3806.JPG
    39.5 KB · Views: 514
Factor again ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)\left(a^2+b^2\right)##

To see that the two factorisations are actually the same, try to re-write the above factorisation as ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a^3+a^2b+ab^2+b^3\right)##. You should see what to do after the first step above.

Normally in factorising we try to factorise each factor as far as possible, so in this case, the first part of this reply is what we normally do.
 
fresh_42 said:
I assume you've meant ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a+b\right)##.

No. "In" not "into", as in, factor again the part ##\left(a^2-b^2\right)## in the expression ##\left(a-b\right)\left(a+b\right)##