Adding Inertia Tensors to 3D Shapes: Parallel Axis Theorem Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Tensors
Click For Summary
To combine inertia tensors of different 3D shapes into a composite shape, first determine the new center of mass. The parallel axis theorem (PAT) is then applied to find the new inertia tensors for each shape along an axis through this center. If the original inertia tensors are oriented differently, a similarity transformation using a rotation matrix can be employed to align them. After aligning the tensors to the same coordinate system, the new tensors can be calculated around the new center of mass using the PAT. This process ensures accurate integration of the inertia properties of the composite shape.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Lets say that I know the inertia tensors for a few different 3D shapes and I want to connect them together into one big composite shape. From what I understand, I first have to find the new center of mass, then using the parallel axis theorem find the new inertia tensors for each body along an axis going through the center, and then just add them up. My question in, what if the new inertia tensors around the center are around axes (plurel of axis?) that aren't pointing in the same direction. Is there a way to rotate the axis of an inertia tensor? Should I make a rotation matrix from each one of the bodies space to the new composite's space and then apply those to the inertia tensors before using the PAT? Can someone give me some details about the PAT in 3D?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can rotate the inertia tensor by what's called a "similarity transformation". If R is a rotation matrix and I is the inertia matrix, then I transforms as

I' = RIR^T
 
Thanks - then after I rotate all the tensors into the same coordinate system I can calculate new tensors around the new center of mass using the parallel axis theorem? How is it done in 3D?
Thanks.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K