Additional textbook to Sakurai and Ballentine

  • Context: Quantum 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai Textbook
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for additional quantum mechanics textbooks that complement the existing texts "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai and "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications" by Ballentine. Participants explore various alternatives that provide worked examples and different explanatory styles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for textbooks similar in level to Sakurai and Ballentine, mentioning Gottfried & Yan, Bellac, and Auletta as potential options.
  • Another participant suggests considering the reasons for wanting an additional textbook and recommends Greiner's books and Landau & Lifshitz for their depth.
  • A participant endorses Gottfried and Yan as a good textbook and also recommends specific volumes from Greiner's series, particularly those focusing on symmetries and field quantization.
  • One participant questions the necessity of a third book, suggesting that Sakurai and Ballentine together provide a comprehensive understanding, and offers alternatives based on the desire for more mathematical rigor or theoretical content.
  • A participant expresses a preference for multiple explanations from different sources, noting that no single book covers all topics adequately.
  • Another participant mentions Shankar's book as a gentle and explanatory resource, although they have not read it fully.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the necessity and value of additional textbooks, with some advocating for more resources while others question the need for them. No consensus is reached on which textbook is definitively better or more suitable.

Contextual Notes

Participants' recommendations depend on personal experiences and preferences for mathematical rigor versus explanatory clarity, indicating that choices may vary based on individual learning styles.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi. I already have Sakurai and Ballentine. I am looking for another textbook at a similar level. I am considering Gottfried & Yan , "Quantum Physics" by Bellac , "Quantum Mechanics" by Auletta. Any thoughts on these textbooks or any other suitable alternatives ? I do like textbooks that have worked examples in them.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Of the mentioned three books I only know Gottfried and Yan, which I think is a very good textbook. Of course, as DrClaude, I also recommend the Greiner books. My favorites in this series are the volume on symmetries in QM (Berndt Müller et al) and "Field Quantization" (Joachim Reinhardt).
 
I believe Sakurai and Ballentine go wonderfully together (you might find Sakurai too concise at times), why would you need a 3rd book? Do you want more mathematics or more explanation for the principles/applications? More mathematics: (the most) = the 2 volume set of Galindo and Pascual which you can find here: https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byl...+Galindo&sort=relevancerank&tag=pfamazon01-20 [yes, the price might seem high, but you can ask for it at the closest big university library]. For more on the theory content (with little emphasis on the mathematics behind) you have the old book by Landau & Lifschitz or the new one by S. Weinberg.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your replies. I like to have as many different explanations as possible as I have found that no single book covers everything or explains everything well.
 
Although I did not read it 100%, Shankar wrote very good book in the quantum mechanics. I say it is quite gentle and explanatory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K