Adiabatic condition and equation of state

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an adiabatic process concerning 8.02 × 10−1 moles of nitrogen gas, focusing on changes in entropy and the relationship between temperature and volume under adiabatic conditions. The context includes the ideal gas law and the specific heat ratio for nitrogen.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the adiabatic process on entropy, with one suggesting that there will be no entropy change due to reversibility. Others explore different methods to relate pressure, volume, and temperature, questioning the validity of ignoring constants in their equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the methods for approaching the problem, with one confirming that multiple methods can yield correct results. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's attempts, and further clarification has been offered regarding the steps involved in the adiabatic condition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the original poster's uncertainty about the final steps in their reasoning and the potential for multiple interpretations of the equations involved. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

LivvyS
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


8.02 × 10−1 moles of nitrogen gas ( γ= 1.40) is contained in a volume of 2.00 × 10−2 m3 at a pressure of 1.00 × 105 Pa and temperature of 300 K. The sample is adiabatically compressed to half its original volume. IT behaves as an ideal gas.

(i) What is the change in entropy of the gas?

(ii) Show from the adiabatic condition and the equation of state that TV γ-1
remains constant, and hence determine the final temperature of the gas

Homework Equations


PV=nRT
PVγ = A (constant)

The Attempt at a Solution


For I, I think that because the compression is a reversible adiabatic process there will be no entropy change.

It is ii, that I am stuck on. I think that the equation of state will need to be rearranged to give P=nRT / V and that this will need to be substituted into the adiabatic condition to give (nRT Vγ) / V = constant which feels close but I cannot think of the last step.

Or is it better to start with PVγ = constant
PVVγ-1 = constant
nRT *Vγ-1 = constant and ignore n and R seeing as they themselves are constants? giving TVγ-1 = constant
(I am not sure whether n and R can just be ignored or whether this method is even correct or valid).

or some other way entirely, any insight would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both methods are correct, and give the correct result. In the first method, Vγ/V=Vγ-1

Chet
 
I think the answer might be along the lines:
PV=nRT
for adiabatic process PVgamma= A
V=nRT/P
so fitting this into the equation:
P(nRT/P)gamma

then you get TgammaP1-gamma=A/(nR)gamma

Use the same principle to substitute P=nRT/V into the adiabatic condition
hope that helps

Sorry about the subscripts, my first post and new to forums. But since I always check here for help, is only fitting that I help when I can
 
Astoreth said:
I think the answer might be along the lines:
PV=nRT
for adiabatic process PVgamma= A
V=nRT/P
so fitting this into the equation:
P(nRT/P)gamma

then you get TgammaP1-gamma=A/(nR)gamma

Use the same principle to substitute P=nRT/V into the adiabatic condition
hope that helps

Sorry about the subscripts, my first post and new to forums. But since I always check here for help, is only fitting that I help when I can
Hi Astoreth. Welcome to Physics Forums.

It looks like LivvyS had already solved the problem correctly in post #1. Do you feel that there was a problem with what he/she did?

Chet
 
Hello:

sorry about that. No, the answer was not incorrect, but given this:

LivvyS said:
which feels close but I cannot think of the last step.
I thought I'd help.

I am sorry if I overstepped. I was only trying to help

Also, i didn't noticed that it was marked as resolved.

Again, am sorry
 
Astoreth said:
Hello:

sorry about that. No, the answer was not incorrect, but given this:I thought I'd help.

I am sorry if I overstepped. I was only trying to help

Also, i didn't noticed that it was marked as resolved.

Again, am sorry
No need to apologize. As you said, you were just trying to help.

The OP used one method to solve it in post #1, and got it correct. And he tried another method to solve it, but couldn't complete the final step. In post #2, I pointed out how to complete the final step, which, when applied, leads to the same correct solution.

Again, Welcome to Physics Forums. It's great to have you in our community.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Thanks, Chet :)
Is good to be here
 
All help much appreciated, thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K