Advent of Color: Revealing the Pattern from Revelation 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iacchus32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the connection between color symbolism, meditation, and spiritual experiences as reflected in Revelation 4. Participants analyze how colors correspond to numbers and concepts, suggesting a deeper universal pattern that may be accessed through meditation. The conversation touches on the relationship between music and color frequencies, particularly the significance of 444 Hz in musical tuning. There is a debate about the nature of enlightenment and whether it stems from a divine source or a collective consciousness. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes the importance of communication and understanding in exploring these mystical concepts.
  • #61
See now Alex? Without reading Iacchus32's post, I know just what he said!

The world becomes bent around the emotionally driven outcome. ALL must somehow fit into what one so emotionally needs to be true. Sad, is it not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Originally posted by LogicalAtheist
See now Alex? Without reading Iacchus32's post, I know just what he said!

The world becomes bent around the emotionally driven outcome. ALL must somehow fit into what one so emotionally needs to be true. Sad, is it not?
Life was meant for living man ... not overanalyzed to every single last detail. So what gives? I thought you said you were going to stop spamming my posts?
 
  • #63
You said it yourself man, your little theory involves you picking numbers for colors with no reasoning.

And then you're applying this PseudoScience to reality?

Come on now man, you MUST be able to see how flaw-filled your idea is?

I'm scared if you cannot!
 
  • #64
Originally posted by LogicalAtheist
You said it yourself man, your little theory involves you picking numbers for colors with no reasoning.

And then you're applying this PseudoScience to reality?

Come on now man, you MUST be able to see how flaw-filled your idea is?

I'm scared if you cannot!
If it makes you happy to believe all of this then go ahead. But don't bother to ask for my reply.
 
  • #65
Originally posted by LogicalAtheist

The world becomes bent around the emotionally driven outcome.


And also around emotionally driven income (from pockets of ignorant buyers).
 
  • #66
Originally posted by Alexander
And also around emotionally driven income (from pockets of ignorant buyers).
I did answer your previous post by the way, in case you're interested. I don't know what it is about LocalAtheist's appeal? ... but I realize some of us are more easily influenced by spam than others. I'll make it easier on you though and repost it below, so it won't be necessary to flip back to the previous page. Now how's that for service! ... And I'll even throw in a couple of smiles at no charge! :smile: :wink:
 
  • #67
Redundant Repost

Originally posted by Alexander
On WHAT ground did YOU assign number "7" to 420 nm wavelength (violet), number "6" to 470 nm = (blue), then NO number to 500 nm (=turquose), "5" to 540 nm (green), then you saddenly miss the number "4" (?!) assigning at will this number to the mixture of all wavewlengths altogether, then "3" to 570 nm (yellow), then "2" to 610 nm (orange), and then "1" to 650 nm (=red)? Any mathematical function, or you just decided to spread numbers at your peronal taste/ feelings?
In school they teach you there are three "primary" colors (red, yellow, blue) and three "secondary" colors (orange, green, violet). Now these are "pigmented colors," as opposed to "colors of light," which I suppose can make a difference? Nonetheless this is how I derived the six basic colors. From there it was an educated guess (per what I said in the previous post) as to what color I should assign to number 1.


Also, what was the reason to leave wide hole in the spectrum (where turquose is) and what was the reason to exclude number "4"? And what was the reason to assign the number "4" not to specific color (wavelength) but to the mixture of all colors?
As I said the six "basic colors" had already been determined (had no idea about turquoise) ... Also, are you familiar with the Jewish Menorah? ... i.e., the older version with seven branches? I was trying to develop a relationship between this and the Star of David (i.e., hexagram), and figure out how to incorporate the number seven (seven branches of the Menorah) into both schemes. Anyway the number "4" is in the center of the Menorah and yet, there are only six colors which can be assigned to Star of David, therefore the only way to add a seventh aspect would be to its center (as in the Menorah). And, since the six colors has already been determined, it only made sense that the center be white, and hence the central color scheme itself -- "white light." This also makes sense in that the stand of the Menorah is the center as well as the "4th aspect." If you follow the link below you might get a better idea.

http://www.dionysus.org/cover.gif


And why after non-mathematical assigment of numbers to colors you still use arithmetic (math) to combine them?
The numbers help to illustrate the symmetry between the Menorah and the Star of David, and that indeed the "4th aspect" belongs in the center (of each).


And what does 37x12=444 mean exactly in your color notation? What is "37" here, what is "444" and what do "x" and "=" mean?
After determining the number values for yellow (3) and violet (7), I realized that it corresponded to this meditation phenomenon that I relate at the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=429", as illustrated by my avatar to the left. Beyond that, I don't know that there's much else to say ... except that it helps illustrate the "spherical" relationship between the symbols, colors, numbers and the meditation technique. If you would like to read more please follow the link ...

http://www.dionysus.org/x0009.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #68
Does anyone actually buy your "book"?
 
  • #69
Originally posted by Alexander
Does anyone actually buy your "book"?
No. Is the book complete? No. Have I made any money from the sales of the book? No. Have I tried to get people to buy the book? No, it needs work. Have I put too much of my time, resources and money into the book? You bet! Do I care anymore? Not much!

I've spent over ten years working on the book and webpage, and thousands of dollars and thousands of hours. At some point I need to get back to it though, and stop spending so much time on Physics Forums.
 
  • #70
Noooooo, don't do that! Stay here - this is a nice place to learn, I like it. Mythology is dying anyway (as education is getting better), and there is plenty of competition there to make money on ignorant public. Not easy bread.

Look at those religion sunday shows on TV - it takes to be a strong maniac caring about nothing but profits - and with good acting talent - to make money on fooling people. It is a tough job.
 
  • #71
Originally posted by Alexander
Noooooo, don't do that! Stay here - this is a nice place to learn, I like it. Mythology is dying anyway (as education is getting better), and there is plenty of competition there to make money on ignorant public. Not easy bread.

Look at those religion sunday shows on TV - it takes to be a strong maniac caring about nothing but profits - and with good acting talent - to make money on fooling people. It is a tough job.
If anybody is fooled, it must be me. I'm the only one who's put any money into it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
13K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K