Adverse pressure gradient on a wing

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the pressure coefficient (Cp) distribution on a symmetrical wing, specifically the NACA 0012 airfoil, at a 10-degree angle of attack. It establishes that while the lower surface starts with a Cp of 1.0 at the stagnation point, it transitions to a freestream Cp of 0 near the trailing edge, indicating a pressure gradient. The conversation highlights the confusion regarding the classification of this gradient as unfavorable, emphasizing that the geometry of the wing does not inherently dictate the pressure gradient's nature, but rather the flow behavior and stagnation point location play crucial roles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerodynamic principles, particularly pressure coefficients (Cp)
  • Familiarity with airfoil characteristics, specifically the NACA 0012 profile
  • Knowledge of flow behavior around wings at various angles of attack
  • Basic grasp of pressure gradients and their implications in aerodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of angle of attack on pressure distribution using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools
  • Study the implications of pressure gradients on lift and drag forces in aerodynamics
  • Explore the concept of stagnation points and their influence on flow characteristics around airfoils
  • Investigate the differences between favorable and unfavorable pressure gradients in various airfoil designs
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aerodynamicists, and students studying fluid dynamics who are interested in understanding the behavior of airflow around wings and the implications of pressure gradients on flight performance.

hob63
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For a symmetrical wing (NACA 0012 - due to wide data avaialble) at 0 deg inclination the following Cp to x/c relationship exists:

CP_expdata_0.jpg


The upper and lower surfaces produce the same Cp and hence a symmetric wing with no inclination doesn't produce a result force (i'm happy with this).

Now at an inclination angle (10 deg) the following happens:

CP_expdata_10.jpg


My question is for the lower surface we have Cp = 1.0 (stagnation point, this is ok), however, this decays to freestream (Cp = 0) close to trailing edge.

Is the lower surface actually an unfavourable pressure gradient? it is a symmetric wing and so I have a hard time seeing the lower as unfavourable (in terms of geometry). Why is it that curving upwards = favourable pressure gradient and curving downwards = unfavourable pressure gradient? there is a small contribution (ρg(Δh)) in terms of pressure due to the actual height, is it simply due to this? Or is it that the stagnation points dominates the lower flow resulting in a high->low gradient and thus an unfavourable gradient (not resulting from the actual geometry but due to the location of the stagnation point).
Cheers for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hob63 said:
Is the lower surface actually an unfavorable pressure gradient?
Why do you call the lower surface gradient unfavorable? As the flow approaches the trailing edge, it should be approaching ambient pressure. Also, the lowest pressure above the wing in the graph seems to occur unusually close to the leading edge.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
18K