Aerodynamics: Recirculation Zone Wake and Speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the effects of speed, specifically Mach number and Reynolds number, on the recirculation zone and wake of blunt bodies, such as the Apollo spacecraft during reentry. It is established that subsonic and transonic speeds increase the length of the recirculation zone, while supersonic and hypersonic speeds decrease it. The conversation emphasizes the importance of conducting independent research, particularly through academic papers, as this topic is highly specialized and not typically covered in standard educational courses. Key parameters influencing the phenomena include inviscid shock angles and viscous effects related to wake unsteadiness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mach number and its implications in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of Reynolds number and its effects on flow characteristics
  • Familiarity with compressible flow concepts and inviscid vs. viscous phenomena
  • Basic principles of aerodynamics related to blunt body reentry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of Mach number on recirculation zones in supersonic and hypersonic flows
  • Explore the relationship between Reynolds number and wake characteristics in fluid dynamics
  • Study the principles of shock angles and their impact on aerodynamic performance
  • Investigate academic papers on recirculation zones and wakes in aerospace engineering
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and students studying compressible flow who seek to deepen their understanding of aerodynamic phenomena related to blunt bodies at various speeds.

aero5682
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
How does speed effect the recirculation zone and wake for supersonic and hypersonic speeds? Does it get longer, wider?
Also this is for a blunt body like apollo reentering
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Speed is not directly relevant. Mach number and Reynolds number will be the most important parameters. You might start there with your search.
 
I thought I had searched for mach number, apparently I hadnt searched mach number or reynolds numbers effects on it. It seems like subsonically and transsonically mach number and reynolds number increase the length of the recirculation zone, and supersonically and hypersonically decrease the length, but nothing I found was very clear on it
 
You'll just have to keep up the search. I don't know any of the details of wakes like that to give you any answers here. I just know the basic parameters that govern it.
 
Ok, thanks. Ill move it to aerospace and see if anything comes up
 
I meant to do your own independent research on it. Search Google scholar and look for papers. You likely won't find that answer by asking on here. It's fairly niche.
 
Yeah it seemed like it. I don't think I am going to find it here. And I will be looking on google scholar and stuff. But it doest hurt to ask. I thought there might have been some well known rules like recompression shock angles or pressure differences or something, or mabey it was some well known thing, but it doesn't seem so
 
There probably are rules of thumb at least to some degree, but the area is so specialized that it's not something that would typically be taught in any undergraduate fluids course or really any graduate courses. It's the sort of thing a researcher would learn from reading papers while conducting their research rather than in a classroom. Shoot, I even teach compressible flow courses and I don't know the answer to this off the top of my head. All I can tell you is that the inviscid phenomena like the shock angles are going to depend pretty much exclusively on the geometry and the Mach number, and the viscous phenomena like unsteadiness in the wake are going to be based on the Mach and Reynolds numbers.
 
Hmmm, I wonder if since the recompression shocks and those shear layers seem to sort of bound the wake in, if calculating those angles might help, but the unsteadiness in the wake might effect it too. Looks like I have some research to do
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K