Air compression via acceleration?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the effects of acceleration on air compression within an airtight vehicle, examining whether acceleration can lead to a pressure differential or vacuum in the air. Participants consider both theoretical and practical implications of this phenomenon, along with related concepts of buoyancy and pressure gradients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that acceleration in an airtight vehicle will compress the air toward the back, similar to how objects are pushed back during acceleration.
  • One participant calculates that to achieve a pressure of 2 atmospheres at the rear of a cubic box, an acceleration of approximately 78,352 m/s² would be required.
  • Another participant illustrates the effect with the example of a helium balloon moving backward in a car during sudden braking, attributing this to air compression and buoyancy.
  • A question is raised about whether this effect could create a vacuum at the front of the vehicle, with one participant suggesting that a vacuum is theoretically possible under extreme conditions involving antimatter and high accelerations.
  • For realistic accelerations (up to 1g), one participant notes that the air pressure difference would be minimal, akin to the pressure difference experienced at different heights in the atmosphere.
  • There is a discussion about the role of pressure gradients and buoyancy, with some participants arguing that buoyancy requires a pressure gradient, while others contend that it can occur without one.
  • One participant mentions the need for a continuous fluid and a direction for buoyancy, questioning the significance of density gradients in buoyancy calculations.
  • Another participant acknowledges confusion in the discussion regarding pressure and density gradients, indicating a need for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of pressure gradients and buoyancy in the context of air compression due to acceleration. There is no consensus on whether a vacuum can be created or the exact conditions required for significant pressure differences.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific assumptions about the environment and conditions, such as the use of antimatter or extreme accelerations, which may not be practically achievable. The discussion also highlights the complexity of buoyancy and pressure gradients in fluid dynamics.

Tylemaker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When we are sitting in our cars, and the car begins accelerating we are "pushed back" due to acceleration. Or if you have a ball in an empty vehicle, when it starts accelerating, the ball will roll to the back of the car.

I was wondering, is this also true in air? If there is an air-tight vehicle that undergoes massive acceleration will the air be compressed to the back of the vehicle? How much acceleration is needed to compress the air?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, acceleration will compress the air.

Take for example a cubic box 1 meter per side.
Per wikipedia...
At IUPAC standard temperature and pressure (0 °C and 100 kPa), dry air has a density of 1.2754 kg/m3.

100 kpa = 10197 kg/m2 according to this pressure unit calculator.

So, if you wanted to accelerate the box at such a rate that the pressure at the rear of the chamber were 2 atmospheres instead of 1 you would have to accelerate it at (10197/1.2754) g. Doing the arrithmatic that would be about 78,352 m/s2.
 
You can actually see this effect quite easily. If you have a helium balloon floating in your car, if you slam on the brakes, the balloon will actually move backward toward the rear of the car. That is because the acceleration causes the air to compress toward the front, creating a density gradient and the balloon "floats" to the area of lower density due to what is effectively buoyancy. Kind of cool.
 
So does this simply cause lower air pressure at the front of the vehicle or could it potentially create a vacuum at the front of the vehicle?
 
The vacuum will only be able in if we run this in an antimatter environment. this will allow the acceleration to be forced using the nuclear explosions of anti matter with the particles surrounding this enclosed space. next the vacuum will only happen if you reach an accelleration of 1.354E8 Km/(sxs) due to the Borne Oppenheimer approximation. So in conclusion the vacuum is possible but highly unlikely.
 
For realistic accelerations (<= 1g), the air pressure difference is similar to the regular vertical difference at the same length: If you climb on a ladder, the air pressure up there is lower, too, but just by a tiny amount (~1/2000 for 4 meters).
You won't get a perfect vacuum, but you get a good approximation if the scale height is small compared to the length of the car. This would require accelerations of more than 10000 g. Possible in ultracentrifuges, but not with a size of 4m.@physicswinner: Can you show us how you get that number, and where do you use the Born–Oppenheimer approximation? In addition, how is that related to antimatter?
If you just want to post random buzzwords, this might be the wrong place.
 
boneh3ad said:
You can actually see this effect quite easily. If you have a helium balloon floating in your car, if you slam on the brakes, the balloon will actually move backward toward the rear of the car. That is because the acceleration causes the air to compress toward the front, creating a density gradient and the balloon "floats" to the area of lower density due to what is effectively buoyancy. Kind of cool.
I don't think the pressure /density gradient plays a significant role: buoyancy does not require or even take it into account.
 
You need a pressure gradient (usually provided by gravity) to get buoyancy. Otherwise, in which direction should the force point?
 
Check the equation for buoyant force: where is the density variation? Buoyant force just requires a continuous fluid, a volume and a direction and magnitude for gravity.

Asked another way: for a solid object, does the buoyancy significantly change as it sinks?
 
  • #10
russ_watters said:
I don't think the pressure /density gradient plays a significant role: buoyancy does not require or even take it into account.

russ_watters said:
Buoyant force just requires a continuous fluid, a volume and a direction and magnitude for gravity.

I agree the density gradient is insignificant, but gravity causes a vertical pressure gradient even in a solid object. You can think about buoyancy either way, and get to the correct equation.

Note there may be other causes of pressure gradients, for example in a rotating system. Think about the well known experiment with objects more and less dense than water in a centrifuge, for example.
 
  • #11
We're talking about two different things because I confused things by adding the issue of pressure. bonehead just said density gradient. Sorry.
 
  • #12
A sound wave is comprised of parcels of air undergoing longitudinal SHM.

So it propagates by a cycle of the acceleration and deceleration of the SHM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
16K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
19K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K