B Air pressure generated by driving at 60mph

AI Thread Summary
Driving at 60 mph with a 5' L x 12" W open box and a 1/8" hole at the back generates approximately 1/16 psi at the hole, which is independent of the box's drag coefficient. The pressure is primarily determined by the stagnation pressure, which remains constant regardless of the shape or size of the object, as long as the hole remains small. Replacing the box with a funnel does not change the outgoing PSI from the spout, reinforcing that pressure is maximized and unaffected by the object's design. The discussion highlights that while drag coefficients vary with shape, the pressure acting at the stagnation point remains the same. Overall, the pressure generated is a function of airflow dynamics rather than the object's configuration.
david66ad
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
If I place a 5' L x 12" W open box at front and a 1/8" hole at the back of the box and drove my car at 60 mph how much psi would I generate at the 1/8" hole?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably difficult to say without determining the drag coefficient of the box. A small hole like that it isn't going to alter the drag much.

I think you would basically have:

$$ P = \frac 1 2 C_D \rho_{air} v^2 $$
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and jack action
Its interesting that it isn't dependent on the drag coefficient? The drag force varies with it. The drag coefficient encapsulates form drag and pressure drag. I guess the pressure drag portion ( which is what is of interest here) must be independent of the form drag.
 
erobz said:
It's probably difficult to say without determining the drag coefficient of the box. A small hole like that it isn't going to alter the drag much.

I think you would basically have:

$$ P = \frac 1 2 C_D \rho_{air} v^2 $$
If I replaced the box with 5' diameter funnel down to a 1/8" spout, what would the outgoing PSI be from the spout?
 
david66ad said:
If I replaced the box with 5' diameter funnel down to a 1/8" spout, what would the outgoing PSI be from the spout?
It would be the same. A pressure is independent of area.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
david66ad said:
If I replaced the box with 5' diameter funnel down to a 1/8" spout, what would the outgoing PSI be from the spout?
I don't know. Others are saying the pressure is independent of the shape, size, so the drag coefficient is irrelevant. So, it would seem the same as the box. I'm still a bit suspicious to what degree of an approximation that is.
 
erobz said:
Its interesting that it isn't dependent on the drag coefficient? The drag force varies with it. The drag coefficient encapsulates form drag and pressure drag. I guess the pressure drag portion ( which is what is of interest here) must be independent of the form drag.
Stagnation pressure is essentially the maximum drag, or a 1.0 drag coefficient. Can't do better than that, and it isn't hard to achieve. That's the point of a pito-static tube for airspeed measurement.

The OP appears to be under the common but false belief that you can do better with a funnel.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and erobz
  • #10
russ_watters said:
Stagnation pressure is essentially the maximum drag, or a 1.0 drag coefficient. Can't do better than that, and it isn't hard to achieve. That's the point of a pito-static tube for airspeed measurement.

The OP appears to be under the common but false belief that you can do better with a funnel.
The only problem I'm seeing that optimization is apparently automatic independent of shape?
 
  • #11
erobz said:
The only problem I'm seeing that optimization is apparently automatic?
I don't understand what you mean.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
I don't understand what you mean.
You can't alter the shape to reduce the pressure. Its apparently automatically maximized.

The cone and the box will have very different coefficients of drag, but the pressure acting on them is the same; independent of the drag coefficient.
 
  • #13
erobz said:
You can't alter the shape to reduce the pressure. Its apparently automatically maximized.

The cone and the box will have very different coefficients of drag, but the pressure acting on them is the same; independent of the drag coefficient.
Yes. The key feature is just a featureless hole. There's not much that can be done to make it better or worse.

Drag is basically stagnation pressure (force) minus regain. For the OP's question we don't care about regain.
 
  • #14
erobz said:
You can't alter the shape to reduce the pressure. Its apparently automatically maximized.

The cone and the box will have very different coefficients of drag, but the pressure acting on them is the same; independent of the drag coefficient.
The pressure acting at the stagnation point is the same, yes. The overall pressure distribution (and of course the overall drag) is going to highly depend on the shape of course.

Also, interestingly, it is possible for drag coefficient to exceed 1, but you can't exceed stagnation pressure on the pressure side of an object. To create a greater drag coefficient, you need a shape that also creates a low pressure region behind it, creating a greater net force than simply the dynamic pressure applied across the frontal area.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes erobz, russ_watters and Lnewqban
  • #15
cjl said:
Also, interestingly, it is possible for drag coefficient to exceed 1...
[Google] I stand corrected!
 
Back
Top