Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of filling an air wedge with water on the resulting interference pattern produced by light. Participants are examining the relationship between the refractive index of water and the fringe spacing of the interference pattern.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the formula for fringe spacing in an air wedge filled with water, leading to a conclusion that contradicts the textbook answer. Other participants question the validity of the textbook's claim regarding fringe spacing and explore the implications of the refractive index on optical path length.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some expressing agreement on the reasoning that a higher refractive index would affect the optical path length. There is an ongoing exploration of whether the textbook answer is correct, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy between the original poster's calculations and the textbook answer, leading to discussions about the assumptions made regarding the refractive index and its impact on fringe spacing.

Andrew Tom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water
Relevant Equations
##x=\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}##
An air wedge is illuminated with light and an interference pattern is produced. What will happen to the interference pattern when the air wedge is filled with water?

The answer given at the back of the book is that the fringe spacing of the interference pattern will increase, however my reasoning is leading me to the conclusion that it will decrease.

The derivation for fringe spacing given in the book for an air wedge shows that it is ##\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}## where ##\theta## is the wedge angle. When I re-derived the formula using the same reasoning but for water with refractive index n I got the fringe spacing ##\frac{\lambda}{2n\tan\theta}##. So the fringe spacing will decrease because n>1 for water.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrew Tom said:
the interference pattern will increase
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
 
haruspex said:
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
 
Andrew Tom said:
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
 
haruspex said:
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
So is the book wrong?
 
Andrew Tom said:
So is the book wrong?
I would say so. Others may chip in.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K