Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effect of filling an air wedge with water on its interference pattern. The established formula for fringe spacing in an air wedge is given as ##\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}##, while the modified formula for water, considering its refractive index (n), is ##\frac{\lambda}{2n\tan\theta}##. Since the refractive index of water is greater than 1, the fringe spacing decreases when the air wedge is filled with water, contradicting the textbook assertion that it increases. Participants in the discussion agree that the textbook may be incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of interference patterns in optics
  • Familiarity with the concept of refractive index
  • Knowledge of the geometry of air wedges
  • Basic grasp of wave optics and fringe spacing calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of interference patterns in air wedges
  • Learn about the effects of different refractive indices on optical phenomena
  • Explore the principles of wave optics and their applications
  • Investigate common misconceptions in optics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, optical engineers, and educators looking to clarify concepts related to interference patterns and refractive indices in optics.

Andrew Tom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water
Relevant Equations
##x=\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}##
An air wedge is illuminated with light and an interference pattern is produced. What will happen to the interference pattern when the air wedge is filled with water?

The answer given at the back of the book is that the fringe spacing of the interference pattern will increase, however my reasoning is leading me to the conclusion that it will decrease.

The derivation for fringe spacing given in the book for an air wedge shows that it is ##\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}## where ##\theta## is the wedge angle. When I re-derived the formula using the same reasoning but for water with refractive index n I got the fringe spacing ##\frac{\lambda}{2n\tan\theta}##. So the fringe spacing will decrease because n>1 for water.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrew Tom said:
the interference pattern will increase
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
 
haruspex said:
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
 
Andrew Tom said:
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
 
haruspex said:
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
So is the book wrong?
 
Andrew Tom said:
So is the book wrong?
I would say so. Others may chip in.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K