What is the formula for calculating fringe width in an interference pattern?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the fringe width in an interference pattern, specifically comparing scenarios in air and water with different slit separations. The original poster presents a series of equations leading to a formula for fringe width.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the fringe width formula and question whether there are simpler methods to arrive at the solution. Some express appreciation for the detailed steps provided.

Discussion Status

While some participants affirm the correctness of the original poster's solution, others seek alternative approaches or shortcuts, indicating a productive exploration of the topic without reaching a consensus on the necessity of the detailed steps.

Contextual Notes

The problem is framed as a multiple-choice question, which influences participants' desire for brevity in the solution process. There is also mention of previously covered material in class that may affect the depth of explanation required.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png

When the system is in air

## d \sin {\theta} = n \lambda ## ...(1)

When the system is in water and slit separation is 2d,

## \mu 2d \sin {\theta} = n \lambda ## ...(2)

## \tan {\theta} = \frac y D ## ...( 3)

Taking d<<D, ## \tan {\theta} \approx \sin {\theta} ## ...(4)

## \frac { n \lambda }{ 2 \mu d} = \frac { y} D ## ...(5)

## y = \frac { n \lambda D }{ 2 \mu d} ## ...( 6)

Fringe width ## = \frac { \lambda D }{ 2 \mu d} ## ...(7)

Now, ## \frac { \lambda D}{ d} =s ## ...( 8)

Fringe width ## = \frac { s }{ 2 \mu } = \frac { 3s} 8 ##So, the correct option is (e).

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png
    upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 810
  • upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png
    upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 855
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. Nice work!
 
ehild said:
Correct. Nice work!
Is there any easier way to solve it?
Or one has to go through all of those steps for solving the above question.
 
Pushoam said:
Is there any easier way to solve it?
Or one has to go through all of those steps for solving the above question.
Was not it easy? You presented a nice solution, every step explained and clear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
ehild said:
Was not it easy? You presented a nice solution, every step explained and clear.
It was a multiple choice question. So, I was looking for a shorter way.
 
Pushoam said:
It was a multiple choice question. So, I was looking for a shorter way.
Most steps were explained during the class to you, so it was not needed to write down. You have the formula for the distance between nearest interference fringes, and it is proportional to lambda and inversely proportional to d. s' / s = λ'/λ d/d' The wavelength in a medium is the vacuum wavelength divided by the refractive index. So s'/s=(3/4) x (1/2 ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K