I Algorithmic model for primary decay chains

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a computational algorithmic model that can predict entire decay chains of isotopes based solely on their atomic mass number (A) and atomic number (Z). While existing tools like "radioactivedecay.py" utilize experimental data and numerical algorithms to model decay, a comprehensive solution that outputs all primary isotopes and decay modes has not been found. The idea is to develop a code that not only lists these isotopes but also predicts the probabilities of various decay chains, potentially allowing for comparisons with experimental data. The feasibility of turning complex algorithms into simplified equations remains uncertain, with some participants questioning the accuracy of purely theoretical predictions without experimental validation. Overall, the thread highlights a gap in existing models and the desire for a more sophisticated approach to understanding radioactive decay.
Admiralibr123
Messages
14
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Has there been written an algorithmic model in which you put in A and Z integers and it predicts the whole decay chain of isotopes.
I have seen "radioactivedecay.py" python library which employs measured experimental data for its calculations. I have seen models that solve the system of differential equation with numerical algorithms to predict the proportion of nuclides at any given time. But I have yet to see a computational algorithmic model which predicts the whole decay chain (half lives/##\lambda## are optional). Does such a model exist? Is it possible for it to exist?

What I have in mind is a piece of code to which you input only the value of A and Z and it shows you in a graphic or as a list/array all the primary isotopes and modes of decay of the isotope. After this we could add complexity to it and try to predict the probability of all the possible decay chains. We could then try to compare it with the experimental data we have.

I have no idea if every algorithm imaginable can be turned into an equation or not but if there is a class which can and we implement it using that class and then turn it into an equation and it simplifies to something more elegant than what we have today. It would be epic. What do you think of this idea? Has it been already done? Is it impossible? Does the changing into an equation an impossible task?

Googling has resulted in inconclusive results so this is my last hope. Thank You very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you want an ab-initio prediction for all the decay modes? That won't be accurate. You need experimental data.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...