All Physics Books: Difficulty & Theory/Concepts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the evaluation of physics textbooks based on their difficulty and theoretical content. Participants emphasize that ranking books by difficulty is subjective and suggest categorizing them by intended audience, such as introductory versus graduate levels. The consensus is that using standard texts for each educational level is more beneficial than arbitrary difficulty ratings. Additionally, the forum highlights the existence of a dedicated textbook section where members can find detailed information, including Table of Contents, for various physics books.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of physics educational levels (introductory, intermediate, undergraduate, graduate)
  • Familiarity with common physics textbooks and their intended audiences
  • Knowledge of physics topics (Mechanics, Electromagnetism)
  • Experience with forum discussions and community input on academic resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research standard physics textbooks for undergraduate courses
  • Explore the textbook forum for detailed reviews and Table of Contents
  • Investigate categorization methods for educational materials in physics
  • Learn about the differences between introductory and advanced physics concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and academic advisors in physics who are seeking to select appropriate textbooks based on difficulty and theoretical depth.

abiphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
List all physics books you know with the level of difficult PROBLEMS AND also where it stands when it comes to THEORY AND CONCEPTS.
LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY !
1.too easy
2.easy
3.average
4.above average
4.hard
5.very difficult
6.extreme
7.insane!
8.are you nuts!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're asking for a bit too much here...
 
In which topic are you interested right now? Mechanics? EM? We can help you pick a book for specific topics.
 
This topic it's not a bad ideea !
 
mreq said:
This topic it's not a bad ideea !

I second that
 
Ranking textbooks by difficulty is inaccurate. What some find difficult, others may find easy.

It's more ideal to label a book based on its intended reader. That is, introductory vs intermediate and undergraduate vs graduate.

Even so, you will get quality by using the standard texts for each of those levels, for each course. No need to rate every book.
 
But we already have a textbook forum where many textbooks have input from members of the forum, or at the very least contain the Table of Contents of the book. That would be far more useful than any arbitrary ranking some random member gives you on a scale from 1-8.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
602
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K