How Do Allowed k Vectors Become Discrete in Crystals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SchroedingersLion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystals Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of allowed k vectors in crystals, emphasizing that only discrete k vectors are permissible due to Bloch's theorem and the application of periodic boundary conditions. The discreteness arises from the requirement that wave amplitudes must be zero at the boundaries of a confined crystal, which is modeled as a finite Lx*Ly*Lz cube. The conversation highlights that while finite size effects can influence material properties, particularly in mesoscopic superconductivity, the fundamental physics of band structure and k vector discreteness remains intact, as shown through Bloch's theorem and the Dirac's Comb potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bloch's theorem in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with periodic boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of band structure and its relation to wave vectors
  • Concept of coherence length in electron behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Bloch's theorem on electronic band structure
  • Research Dirac's Comb potential and its application in solid-state physics
  • Examine the effects of finite size on superconductivity and critical temperature
  • Explore the relationship between wave vector discreteness and crystal boundaries
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying solid-state physics, particularly those interested in the behavior of electrons in crystalline structures and the implications of finite size effects on material properties.

SchroedingersLion
Messages
211
Reaction score
56
Greetings,

I am having troubles with understanding the allowed k vectors in a crystal.
Bloch's theorem gives us discrete energy bands for each wave vector k.

However, only discrete k vectors are allowed. Using periodic boundary conditions, the discreteness is easy to show.
But I am having a hard time in understanding how the discreteness follows from the condition that the wave amplitude must be zero at the boundaries of a crystal. Is the latter even correct? The electrons are confined to a Lx*Ly*Lz cube so that their amplitude should drop to zero at the boundaries. Can anyone offer a proof in how that translates to discrete k vectors? The volume boundaries are a continuum, so I don't really know how that would work.SL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think many things related to crystalline nature of the solid will break down at the boundary. The reason one usually ingores it is because there is a more bulk than surface. So I would not worry about the surface - its far away. The electrons in solids have finite coherence length, so in practice no electron actually 'feels' the whole crystal. Only its immediate neighbourhood. In some cases, such as mesoscopic superconductivity, this is no longer true and there you do see surafce and finite size effects affecting the material properties, e.g. the critical temperature of superconductors begins to drop once they get smaller than their coherence length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SchroedingersLion
There are two issues here that are essentially unrelated.:

1) the limitation to discrete values of k just means you have a finite piece of material. Only an infinitely large box allow truly continuous k. This usually just provides a convenient way to normalize things and does not affect the physics although for long wavelengths or small objects care must be taken. Not really the issue.

2)band structure arises because of the periodic nature of solids. It is relatively easy to show using Bloch's theorem that solutions for electrons in a periodic potential will propagate well only for a limited subset of k. (look up Dirac's Comb potential). This arises because of resonant reflection and transmission of different wavelengths (much like multi-layer optical filters for light). Of course in 3D with real atoms life is more complicated. but the fundamental physics is not .

So do not conflate the two issues...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SchroedingersLion

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K