Alpha and beta particles in gas ionization

Click For Summary
Alpha particles are more effective at ionizing gases than beta particles due to their higher energy loss per unit distance (dE/dx), primarily because of their lower velocities. The scattering cross-section for alpha particles is greater since they move slower than beta particles, allowing for more interactions with electrons. Although negative charges do repel each other, the ionization efficiency is influenced more by the charge and velocity of the particles than by repulsion. The dominance of these factors explains why alpha particles are superior in this context. Understanding these principles is essential for comprehending gas ionization processes.
scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Hello, why alpha particles are better at ionizing gases than beta particles ?
shouldn't the negative particles repel more electrons ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scientifico said:
Hello, why alpha particles are better at ionizing gases than beta particles ?
shouldn't the negative particles repel more electrons ?

thanks

Try to be more specific. What do you mean by "better"?
 
I assume "better" refers to the fact that dE/dx is much higher.

This is basically because Rutherford-like scattering has a cross-section that varies as v^{-2} (because high-velocity particles aren't deflected very much). MeV alphas have much lower velocities than MeV betas, and therefore the cross-section for an electron to scatter off of them is much higher.

There are lots of other factors involved (e.g., the square of the charge), but this is the dominant one in this comparison. For more detail: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula
 
scientifico said:
shouldn't the negative particles repel more electrons ?
The magnitude of the force between two negative charges is the same as the force between one negative and one positive charge - the direction is different, but that does not matter here.
For the comparison alpha<->beta, see bcrowell's explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K