Ampere's Law and Conductor: Finding ∫B.dl for a Semicircle in the x-z Plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on applying Ampere's Law to a semicircular conductor carrying current 'I' in the x-y plane. The integral ∫B.dl for a circular path in the x-z plane was initially calculated incorrectly as zero due to the absence of current through the loop. Participants clarified that to apply Ampere's Law correctly, one must consider the semicircular path as part of a complete circuit, including a straight line from B to A. The final expression for the integral is established as (1-√3/2)μ0I, demonstrating the importance of superposition and the correct interpretation of magnetic fields from both the semicircular and straight conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ampere's Law
  • Biot-Savart Law
  • Magnetic field concepts
  • Vector calculus for line integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Ampere's Law in non-closed circuits
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart Law for calculating magnetic fields
  • Explore superposition principles in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the implications of magnetic field direction and current flow
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the application of Ampere's Law and magnetic field calculations in circuit theory.

  • #31
TSny said:
Yes, everything looks good. I was misinterpreting how you were using the word "equivalent". I thought you were implying that the semicircle current (alone) and the D loop produce the same result for the integral of Bnet around the circular path.

What if you replaced the semicircular current from A to B with a current of a different shape, such as shown in the attachment?

Are the points A and B along the axis of the integration circle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If A and B are along the axis I would say the OP's a is correct but not b or c.

(I might as well benefit from this too!) :biggrin:
 
  • #33
rude man said:
If A and B are along the axis I would say the OP's a is correct but not b or c.

I wish TSny is a bit lenient in his marking :wink:. I somehow have the feeling that getting one answer correct should be enough to pass the test :-p.
 
  • #34
rude man said:
Are the points A and B along the axis of the integration circle?

Yes, I should have made that clear. A and B are still in the same location relative to the path of integration.
 
  • #35
Tanya Sharma said:
I wish TSny is a bit lenient in his marking :wink:. I somehow have the feeling that getting one answer correct should be enough to pass the test :-p.

Well, I'm retired. So, I refuse to do any more grading! :-p
But, if you were to use Tanya's suggested grading scheme, then you both passed. Tanya gets A+ on this one. (That is, her answers agree with mine, anyway.)
 
  • #36
Wow ! I can't believe I topped the class :-p

Have to say the Prof. is really cool :biggrin:.
 
  • #37
TSny said:
Well, I'm retired. So, I refuse to do any more grading! :-p
But, if you were to use Tanya's suggested grading scheme, then you both passed. Tanya gets A+ on this one. (That is, her answers agree with mine, anyway.)

Tanya's answers for b and c seem to have the wrong sign, otherwise I agree.

A downward current gives a positive B circulation as I understand it.
 
  • #38
Tanya Sharma said:
Wow ! I can't believe I topped the class :-p

Have to say the Prof. is really cool :biggrin:.

Congrats! And yes, we owe Dr. T. one - or actually several by now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K