Ampere's Law and two conducting parallel plates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Ampere's Law to determine the magnetic field generated by two conducting parallel plates with uniform current densities flowing parallel to their surfaces. Participants express confusion regarding the appropriate placement of Amperian loops and the implications of their arguments about the magnetic field outside the plates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the placement of Amperian loops and question the validity of their reasoning regarding the magnetic field outside the plates. There is discussion about the direction of the magnetic field and the effects of current direction on field cancellation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering various approaches to understanding the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of superposition and the characteristics of the magnetic field, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretations or conclusions drawn from the arguments presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of an exam preparation context, which may influence their reasoning and the urgency of their inquiries. There is also a noted lack of information regarding the directions of the currents in the plates, which affects the discussion on field superposition.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
hey sorry for the prolific posting but exam's are coming up and I'm just working through past papers.

two conducting parallel plates have uniform uniform current densities flowing through them parallel to their surface. Use Ampere's Law to find the magnetic field inside and outside the plates.

im quite confused as to where to take my loops here in order to find the field at all the various places I am reuqired to. any suggestions?

also why does the following argument not work here:
integrate round an amperian loop that doesn't intersect either plate and get
B(r)-B(r+dr)=0 as no enclosed current
gives B(r)=B(r+dr) implies B(r)=0 but B goes to 0 at infinity so B is zero outised the plates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What direction do you think the field is in? Use symmetry.
 
surely it depends on the direction the two currents are flowing in - if they're opposite then they will cancel. I am not sure abou where to put the magnetic field lines when its a plane and not like a wire or something.

also why does my arhument about the field being 0 outside break down here - isn't that legitimiate for showing the field is 0 outside of a solenoid?
 
Use superposition. Find the field due to one plate, then the other (which will be either symmetric or anti-symmetric) and then add them up.
 
ok but where do i place my amperian loops

and why is the field not 0 outside the plates according to me argument at the end of post 1?
 
The ampere loops should be rectangles that cross the plate, and have 2 sides parallel to the plate.

I don't think I get what you mean by your previous argument.
 
ok so if i integrat round said loop for the top plate i get

int(B.dr) = mu_0 int(K.dA)
int(B.dr)= BL -0.L where L is the length of the loop

so B =mu_0/L int(K.dA)
hows that?

surely my previous argument proves there is no field outside a solenoid? why can't i use it similarly here?
 
This isn't a solenoid, it's a plate...

Uh. Int(K.dl) not dA since K is a surface current, you integrate over a line.

Draw the thing and see that in the loop, B moves to the right above the plate, and to the left below the plate. Thus B is parallel to dl through the top and bottom lines and perpendicular to dl in the left and right lines.

What do you get for that?
 
BL-B(-L)=mu_0 KL implies B=mu_0 K/2 from each plate presumably

two questions:
(i) are the field lines from these plates similar to those for a current loop magnetic dipole? i.e. they run parallel to the surface and then curve back round onto the other end of the surface?
(ii)we aren't told the directions of the two currents so how do we know whether they superimpose or cancel each other out?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K