Electric field due to charged plates moving through a plasma

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the behavior of an idealized parallel plate capacitor moving through a diffuse neutral plasma composed of free protons and electrons. The setup involves charged plates traveling at high velocity, with the leading plate positively charged and the trailing plate negatively charged. The electric field dynamics are influenced by the interaction of the charged plates with the plasma, leading to a complex charge density distribution that must be calculated using Gauss's law and integration techniques. Key equations include the relationship between velocity, charge density, and electric field strength, highlighting the need for iterative solutions to account for changing conditions within the plasma.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with plasma physics concepts, including charge density and Debye shielding
  • Knowledge of particle dynamics in electromagnetic fields
  • Ability to perform calculus-based integration for charge density calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Debye shielding in plasma physics
  • Learn about the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations in plasma dynamics
  • Investigate the mean free path of particles in relation to electric field configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and researchers interested in plasma dynamics and the behavior of charged particles in electric fields, particularly in high-velocity scenarios.

timelessmidgen
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi folks, this is not an actual HW question, but rather one of personal interest. I'm basically trying to understand your classic idealized parallel plate capacitor, but moving face-on through a plasma.

1. Homework Statement

We have a diffuse neutral plasma made of free protons and electrons (each particle type with number density n and charges +e and -e respectively). Through the plasma we have a set of charged parallel plates traveling at high velocity, v0. The plates lie in the X-Y plane and the velocity vector is in the the direction of +z (IE it's moving through the plasma face on.) The parallel plates are not solid sheets, but made of diffuse mesh wire grids, so plasma particles can move through the charged plates without hitting solid material. The square root of the area of the charged plates is much larger than their plate separation, which itself is much larger than the separation of the wires which make up the mesh grid. In other words, we can approximate it as an ideal, infinitely large parallel plate capacitor. The charged plates are held at a constant potential difference, V, with the leading plate charged positively, and the trailing plate negatively. Note that the capacitor is moving fast. It's traveling much faster than the mean thermal velocity of the protons, and faster or of order the mean thermal velocity of the electrons. BUT, 0.5 mev02<V e (IE, the electrons that flow into the parallel plates don't make it across the potential gap, they get shot out the top first.)

After an initial equilibration, what is the electric field above, between, and below the charged plates? What is the surface charge density, σp, of the plates?

Homework Equations


v0>>sqrt(2kbT/mp)
v0≥sqrt(2kbT/me)
0.5 mev02<V e
standard equations regarding Gauss's law and parallel plates.

The Attempt at a Solution


The geometry I apply: stick the bottom plate at z=0, the top plate at z=h, and let the plasma flow downward through it.

Initially, the electric field will just be that of a classic parallel plate capacitor: Ez=-σ/ε between the plates, 0 above and below the plates. After a moment, however, charged particles start streaming through, adding a volume charge density. This volume density will essentially be the total amount of charge swept up times the fraction of time each particle spends at each layer in between the plates. In other words, for protons and electrons the charge volume density is:

ρ=±n V e / v(as a function of z)
ρ=±n V e / sqrt( V^2 + 2 a (z-h))

where a is the particle acceleration. For protons ap=-V e/(h mp), for electrons ae=V e/(h me).
The total charge density is just the addition of these two (though we have to be a little bit careful working with them, since ρ for the electrons is only defined down to the electron turnover point, h-v/(2 ae), and below that it's zero.)

It gets a little bit hairy, but I can actually integrate up little slices of ρ(z) dz and find the electric field everywhere due to these new charge densities. So now we have a new electric field. Of course the problem doesn't stop there, because particles keep flowing in through our capacitor, and now they'll be feeling this NEW electric field. I could, perhaps, throw in some numbers and iterate: figure out the velocity of the particles under this new field, construct a new charge density, integrate slices to find electric field, repeat, and pray for convergence. But I'm not sure that's a great idea...

Is there a simpler way to approach this? Does this sound like any familiar problems? I'm not so hot with plasma physics - should I be learning about Debye shielding? Does Debye shielding even work (or work the same way) when you're dealing with macroscopic velocities that are larger than the thermal velocities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the mean free path of your particles compared to the capacitor plate spacing? If it is small, you can model everything like a gas flow, just with positive and negative charges separately. If it is large, you also have to keep track of the velocity distribution at every point.

I'm not sure if your problem is perfectly well-defined: every charge accumulation will lead to a global electric field that does not go to zero for increasing distances.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K