Ampere's Law - Magnetic Field Strength

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Ampere's Law to derive the magnetic field strength (H) at a distance R from a long, straight wire carrying a current (I). The key formula derived is H = I/2πR, which is achieved by integrating the magnetic field (B) around a cylindrical path surrounding the wire. The relationship between B and H is clarified, with H being defined as H = B/μ0, where μ0 is the permeability of free space. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the integration process and the assumptions made regarding the wire's length.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law and its integral form
  • Familiarity with magnetic field concepts and the permeability constant (μ0)
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Concept of cylindrical coordinates in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampere's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about the relationship between magnetic field strength (H) and magnetic flux density (B)
  • Explore applications of Ampere's Law in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the significance of the permeability constant (μ0) in various materials
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electromagnetic fields and their applications in real-world scenarios.

teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Use Ampere's Law to show that the magnetic fi eld strength at a distance R from a long, straight wire, carrying a current I, is:

H = I/2\piR

Homework Equations



F=qVB
B=\mu0I/2\piR

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to answer this question. I got the integral form of Ampere's Law as:

∫B.dl=\mu0I

However I don't understand what the question is asking me. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's Law is used to described the relationship between enclosed current and magnetic field.

∫B.dl=μ0I

Here, B refers to the magnetic field given off by the wire. Since the length of the wire can be assumed to be infinite, we assume the magnetic field strength is independent of the length of the wire. dL refers to an infinitesimal distance along the path you're integrating over. μ0 is the permeability constant and I refers to the current enclosed within the region of space your integrating over.

What you have to do is integrate the region at a radius R around the wire (assume B is constant). Than substitute this quantity into Gauss Law.
 
Hey Gauss,

So if B is constant:

B∫dl=\mu0I
Bl=\mu0I

Gauss' Law: ∫B.dA=Q/\mu0

So BA=Q/\mu0

How do I equate these?
 
Oh I'm sorry I misspoke. I meant to say substitute this into Ampere's Law.

Since you recognized B is constant you got B∫dl which is correct. However, the integral of dl isn't only l.

For this integral you are integrating a cylinder around the wire. The way Ampere's Law works is that you integrate a shape that encompasses the object, in this case, a wire. Think of a cylinder that completely surrounds the wire and expands as long as the wire does. You take the integral of this shape (where dl is a small portion on the cylinder) then set this equal to μ0I(enclosed).
 
Ok makes a bit more sense now :P Thanks for the help by the way.

So the integral of dl is l+c?
 
Last edited:
Actually the integral of dl is definite, so you don't need to include + C.

Ignore the wire for a second. Imagine all you are doing is integrating a cylinder (while not considering the two end faces, just considering the body). This cylinder has a radius R. l is an infintesimal slice of this cylinder, and you are concerned about the outer edge of this cylinder only.

dl is a few small portion of this edge. It can be defined as dl = Rdθ because R is the radius of the cylinder (and remains constant) while θ changes. Since the cylinder edge is effectively a circle, you will integrate from 0 to 2π.

so use this definition of dl as well as the bounds of integrating (0 to 2π) in Ampere's law.

B∫dl = μ0I
 
Ah so the integral is:

2\piR - 0

So I can then get B = \mu0I/2\piR

But in the question there is no \mu0. Can you explain why this is?
 
Yes that's the correct integral. So you've derived B = μ0I/2πR. The magnetic field strength "H" is related to B by H = B/μ0 + M. You aren't concerned about the magnetization "M" for this problem so H = B/μ0. All you have to do is divide your derived equation by μ0, and you have proven what was asked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Brilliant! Thanks a million Gauss, you explained the process very clearly and you were quick responding. This is why I love using these forums.
 
  • #10
No problem, glad to help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K