Rewriting the Ampere's law in term of free currents only

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Ampere's law in calculating the magnetic field within a toroidal magnet with N turns of wire carrying current I. The rewritten form of Ampere's law is presented as ∮ \vec H \cdot d \vec l = I, with the relationship between magnetic field B and magnetic field strength H defined as B = \mu H = \mu_0 \mu_r H. The user seeks assistance in proving this rewritten law to proceed with their assignment, as it has not been covered in class.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's law and its applications
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their properties
  • Knowledge of toroidal geometry in electromagnetism
  • Basic proficiency in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Ampere's law in the context of free currents
  • Explore the derivation of the magnetic field in toroidal coils
  • Learn about the relationship between B, H, and permeability in electromagnetism
  • Review lecture notes from MIT's Physics II: Electricity and Magnetism course
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in advanced electrical engineering or physics research focused on magnetic fields and their calculations.

Riemann9471
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Prove that Ampere's law ( ∮ B dl = mu_0 x enclosed current ) can be rewritten in terms of free currents only like this : ∮ (1/mu_r) B dl = mu_0 x free enclosed current where mu_r is the relative permeability of the material.
Relevant Equations
Ampere's law : ∮ B dl = mu_0 x enclosed current
Ampere's law rewritten : ∮ (1/mu_r) B dl = mu_0 x free enclosed current
This is not really the assignment of my homework ( my assignment require me to find the magnetic field inside a small air gap on a toroide magnet wrapped with N turns of a wire that carry a current I ) . I'm at some point in the solution where I kind of need to use the rewritten Ampere's law to continue but I can't use it unless I prove it because it has not been proven in class. I couldn't find the proof anywhere so I was hoping to find a little help here !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can work through this:

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/lecture-notes/lecture29.pdf
 
Not sure what the problem is here, but

Ampere's law is actually ## \oint \vec H \cdot d \vec l = I ##
and B relates to H by ## B = \mu H = \mu_0 \mu_r H ##
so there you go. I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K