Ampere's Law -- What is the meaning behind each part?

  • Thread starter Thread starter np115
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law relates the magnetic field around a current-carrying wire to the current itself, expressed as S B · dl = μ₀I. The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field at a point outside a wire, with the question of whether to use B(2πa) or B(2πb). It is clarified that a single current-carrying wire does not create a uniform magnetic field, but symmetry allows for simplifications in calculations. The correct approach involves using a circular path of radius R around the wire to derive B(R) using Ampere's circuital law. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying Ampere's Law correctly in various scenarios.
np115
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
So I know that SB · dl = u0I (sorry this is the only way that was working). But I was wondering what each part meant? Cause in Gauss's law, the SE · dA is the object that is being used to calculate electric field and in Ampere's, it is meant to be similar. So if we had a wire of radius a. This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like? From what I have learned, we would use a circle for this. So B(2pi a) or B(2pi b)?
Relevant Equations
S B · dl = u0I
I believe it would be B(2pi b) but I'm not sure how exactly to explain why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
np115 said:
Homework Statement:: So I know that SB · dl = u0I (sorry this is the only way that was working). But I was wondering what each part meant? Cause in Gauss's law, the SE · dA is the object that is being used to calculate electric field and in Ampere's, it is meant to be similar. So if we had a wire of radius a. This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like? From what I have learned, we would use a circle for this. So B(2pi a) or B(2pi b)?
Relevant Equations:: S B · dl = u0I

I believe it would be B(2pi b) but I'm not sure how exactly to explain why.
You need to read Ampere's law carefully.
 
np115 said:
This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like?
No wire creates a uniform magnetic field.
If you wanted to calculate the electric field due to a charged sphere of radius ##a## at point ##b## outside the sphere, would you use ##E (4 \pi a^2)## or ##E (4 \pi b^2)## on the left hand side of the equation for Gauss's law? Why?

I agree with @rude man: study Ampere's law some more and pay attention to how it is used in your textbook's examples.
 
Of course a single current-conducting wire doesn't create a uniform magnetic field, but you can use symmetry for the simple case of an infinitely long wire. You know by symmetry that the magnetic field is always of the form ##\vec{B}(\vec{r})=B(R) \vec{e}_{\varphi}##, where I've put the wire along the ##z##-axis of a cylinder-coordinate system ##(R,\varphi,z)##.

To get ##B(R)## just use Ampere's circuital law with a circle of radius ##R## around the ##z##-axis in a plane perpendicular to the ##z##-axis.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top