Graduate An aqueos solution of ##M^+X^-## from Kubo's problems book

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem from Kubo's textbook regarding the equilibrium concentrations of ions in two rooms separated by a semi-permeable membrane. The provided solution outlines the conditions for electrical neutrality and conservation laws for the ions, leading to derived equations for the concentrations of ions in both rooms. However, confusion arises when a participant questions the validity of the derived equations, particularly regarding the concentration of ions in room II, suggesting that they arrive at a conclusion that contradicts the solution. Another participant points out a potential mistake in the conservation equations and emphasizes the importance of equal chamber volumes, which is not explicitly stated in the problem. This highlights the complexity of applying theoretical principles to practical scenarios in thermodynamics.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
My following question is from Kubo's textbook on Thermodynamics advanced problems.

I'll quote both the question and its solution in the book, and after that I'll ask my questions regarding the solution offered in the book.

Question 40:
An aqueous solution of ##M^+X^-## of concentration ##x_1^0## is poured into room I, and another solution ##M^+R^-## of concentration ##x_2^0## into the other room II, which is separated from the room I by a semi-permeable membrane permeable for ##M^+## ions and ##X^-## ions but not for ##R^-## ions.
What are the concentrations of ##M^+X^-## in room I and II, ##x_1'## and ##x_1''##, when the equilibrium (Donnan's membrane equilibrium) is reached by diffusion of ##M^+## and ##X^-## ions through the membrane?
For the sake of simplicity, assume that the solutions are very dilute, and may be regarded as ideal dilute solutions. [Hint: the solution must always be electrically neutral.]

The solution offered in the book:
According to the condition of electrical neutrality,
$$(1a)\ \ \ \ \ \ x'_{M^+}=x'_{X^-}$$
$$(1b) \ \ \ \ \ x''_{M^+}=x''_{X^-}+x_2^0 , $$

although ##M^+## and ##X^-## are exchanged between I and II.
Also the conservation laws for ##M^+## and ##X^-## require the equations:
$$(2) \ \ \ \ \ x'_{M^+}+x''_{M^+}=x_1^0 , \ \ x'_{X^-}+x''_{X^-}=x_1^0$$
On the other hand, the equilibrium condition is:
$$(3)\ \ \ \ \ \bar{G}_{M^+X^-(I)}=\bar{G}_{M^+X^-(II)}.$$
If an ideal dilute solution is assumed, the latter condition becomes:
$$(4)\ \ \ \ \ RT\log(x'_{M^+}x'_{X^-})=RT\log(x''_{M^+}x''_{X^-}),$$
or $$x'_{M^+}x'_{X^-}=x''_{M^+}x''_{X^-},$$
where equations (4.33) have been used (##\phi^0_{M^+}## and ##\phi_{X^-}^0## are the same for I and II).
Substituting equations (1a), (1b) and (2), we obtain ##(x_{X^-})^2=(x_1^0-x_{X^-}'')^2=(x_{X^-}''+x_2^0)x_{X^-}''##, and hence:
$$x_{X^-}''=\frac{(x_1^0)^2}{2x_1^0+x_2^0}$$
In the same way,
$$x_{X^-}' = \frac{x_1^0(x_1^0+x_2^0)}{2x_1^0+x_2^0}$$
or
$$x'_{X^-}/x''_{X^-}=1+x_2^0/x_1^0$$
This means that ##M^+ X^-## itself is distributed between I and II in the ratio ##x_1^0+x_2^0:x_1^0##

Now, the derivations are ok but I seem to be getting that: ##x_2^0##.
From ##(1a)-(1b),(2)## I get the following:
$$x_1^0-x_{X^-}''=x_{X^-}'=x'_{M^+}=x^0_1-x''_{M^+}=x_1^0-x''_{X^-}-x_2^0$$
from which follows that ##x_2^0=0##.

Have I done something wrong here?I don't think so...
I am confused can anyone explain this to me?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a mistake in (2). x'X- + x''X- = x10, but x'M+ + x''M+ = x10 + x20
All this of course assumes that the volumes of the two chambers (we wouldn't usually say "rooms", are you translating?) are equal, which is not stated.
 
I am not translating, Iv'e copied from I assume a translated copy of Kubo's textbook.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K