An impractical bridge, but would it work?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dylman3003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a balsa wood bridge, specifically exploring the concept of using an elliptical support system. Participants examine the practicality and efficiency of a complete ellipse versus a half ellipse in bridge construction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why elliptical bridge support systems are not typically completed, suggesting that a complete ellipse might be more efficient than a half ellipse for a balsa wood bridge.
  • Another participant explains that arches and spheres are strongest when pressure is directed inward, noting that gravity exerts downward pressure, which affects the forces on an ellipse differently depending on its configuration.
  • A further contribution posits that if the ellipse were completed, the downward force could be redistributed as a compression force against the top, potentially creating a balance of forces that might benefit the structure.
  • Another participant counters the initial question by pointing out that completed ellipses do exist in bridge designs, referencing the Quebec bridge as an example and discussing the implications of material weight and support forces in bridge construction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and efficiency of complete versus half ellipses in bridge design. While some suggest that a complete ellipse could offer benefits, others highlight the challenges and material considerations that influence bridge design choices.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that self-weight is a significant factor in bridge design, particularly when considering the materials used, such as balsa wood versus traditional materials. The discussion also touches on the need for suitable support locations for effective force distribution.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in engineering, architecture, or materials science, particularly in the context of structural design and analysis.

Dylman3003
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What I'm asking is this: I'm researching bridge designs for a balsa wood bridge, but I'm wondering why that the ellipse of a curve of a bridge support system is never completed?

I understand that bridge that had an ellipse bisected by a roadway would be impractical in reality, but would it be more efficient than a half ellipse in my case where I'm building a balsa wood bridge
(Disclaimer: This is not homework)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An arch or sphere or what have you is strongest when the pressure is pushing inward. The structure is being compacted into itself.

If the pressure is outward, an arch or sphere isn't as strong.

Gravity only pushes straight down. That's pushing inward on the top half of an ellipse and outward on the bottom half.
 
But if the ellipse is completed, shouldn't the force downward be redistributed as a compression force against the top when (the load is centered) the bottom of the ellipse pulls downwards? In effect, shouldn't this new sideways force on the top directly compress against that of the top trying to pull downwards?...

i may have to use a lap joint than a perfect butt joint for this statement though
 
First of all, welcome to Physics Forums.

but I'm wondering why that the ellipse of a curve of a bridge support system is never completed?

Who said they are never completed?

Take a look at the picture of the Quebec bridge in post#13 in this thread.

You will see two fully completed "ellipses" supporting a centre drop-in "half" ellipse span.

Self weight is the controlling factor in most bridges since the weights (densities) of real materials needed to withstand traffic loads and environmental degradation far exceeds that of balsa. Self weight is usually (by far) the largest load imposed on a bridge.

Given the above you can immediately see why saving half the material is often attractive.

What you are describing would work - a ring structure will span between a couple of supports.

What bridge builders are doing by cutting it in half is to replace the forces that would be present (in a full ring) at the cut with forces supplied by the supports. This replaces the weight of half the ring with supports forces.

Of course to supply these (quite enormous) support forces can only be done at suitable sites.

Does this help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K