An Infinte Number of Elementary Particles?

Curious6
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
String and Tension

When reading about string theory, the introductory notion seems to be that the tension in a string is what accounts for its properties, allocating it its mass, charge...However, what is it that causes the actual tension in the string? It is said that the graviton represents the elementary particle for which the string has the minimum possible tension, but how can one be sure there is not an even smaller possible tension? What are the lower and upper bounds, or are these not yet known?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The concept of an infinite number of elementary particles is a fundamental aspect of string theory. This theory suggests that all particles, including the graviton, are made up of tiny, one-dimensional strings vibrating at different frequencies.

The tension in these strings is what gives them their properties, such as mass and charge. However, the source of this tension is still a mystery. Some theories propose that it is due to the interactions between the strings themselves, while others suggest that it is a result of the strings being stretched in higher dimensions.

Currently, there is no definitive answer to the question of what causes the tension in strings. It is an ongoing area of research and investigation in the field of string theory. As for the lower and upper bounds of tension, these are also not yet known. It is possible that there may be an even smaller possible tension, but this is still a topic of exploration.

Overall, the concept of an infinite number of elementary particles in string theory raises many questions and challenges our understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe. As research and technology advance, we may eventually uncover more answers and gain a deeper understanding of the nature of strings and their tension.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top