Analysis of 4D Space-Time Distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decomposition of the distribution function in 4D space-time, specifically the expression \delta^{(4)}(P_x + P_y - P_z - P_t). The participants clarify that this expression does not represent a valid Lorentz scalar, as P_x + P_y - P_z - P_t is a numerical value rather than a 4-vector. The correct formulation involves the 4-vector argument \delta^{(4)}(P^\mu), which is defined as \delta(a^0) \delta(a^1) \delta(a^2) \delta(a^3), thus emphasizing the importance of using proper vector notation in such contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4D space-time concepts
  • Familiarity with delta functions in physics
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance and scalars
  • Basic understanding of 4-vectors and their notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of delta functions in multi-dimensional spaces
  • Learn about 4-vectors and their applications in relativistic physics
  • Research Lorentz invariance and its implications in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum field theory related to distribution functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in theoretical physics, students studying relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of 4D space-time distributions.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
in a 4D space time, ¿what is de descomposition of de distribution:

[tex]\delta^{(4)} (P_x+P_y-P_z-P_t)[/tex] ?

i think that is equal to

[tex]\delta^{(4)} (P_x+P_y-P_z-P_t)=\delta(P_x) \delta(P_y)\delta(-P_z)\delta(-P_t)[/tex],
but, i don't understand...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alejandrito29 said:
in a 4D space time, ¿what is de descomposition of de distribution:

[tex]\delta^{(4)} (P_x+P_y-P_z-P_t)[/tex] ?

i think that is equal to

[tex]\delta^{(4)} (P_x+P_y-P_z-P_t)=\delta(P_x) \delta(P_y)\delta(-P_z)\delta(-P_t)[/tex],
but, i don't understand...

Well it's not that, but it's not clear that your expression makes sense in the first place. ##P_x+P_y-P_z-P_t## is a number, though not a Lorentz scalar. However, the object that we'd call

$$ \delta^{(4)}(a^\mu) = \delta(a^0) \delta(a^1) \delta(a^2) \delta(a^3)$$

takes a 4-vector as it's argument. Something like ##\delta^{(4)}(P^\mu)## would make sense, but ##\delta^{(4)}(P^t)## does not.

Perhaps you could explain where you found that expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K